辨喜文献馆

卷7 conversation
1,919 字数 · 8 分钟阅读 · Conversations and Dialogues

本译文由人工智能辅助工具生成,可能存在不准确之处。如需查阅权威文本,请参考英文原文。

AI-translated. May contain errors. For accurate text, refer to the original English.

中文

斯瓦米吉偕同尼维迪塔修女(Sister Nivedita)、斯瓦米·瑜伽南达(Swami Yogananda)及其他人,午后前往阿里普尔(Alipur)的动物园参观。动物园园长赖·兰梵拉哈玛·桑亚尔·巴哈都尔(Rai Rambrahma Sanyal Bahadur)热情地迎接了他们,并陪同他们在园中参观。斯瓦米吉一边观赏各种动物,一边随口谈及达尔文(Darwin)关于动物逐步进化的理论。弟子记得,进入蛇类展示厅时,他指着一条躯体盘着环纹的巨大蟒蛇,随口说道:"随着时间的推移,这条蛇演化成了陆龟。那条蛇长期静止不动,身体逐渐变硬成了甲壳。"他又打趣地对弟子说:"你们吃陆龟,是不是?达尔文认为,正是这条蛇在岁月的流逝中演化成了陆龟——那么你们也是在吃蛇啰!"弟子抗议说:"先生,当一种生物通过进化蜕变为另一种生物时,它便不再保有原来的形貌和习性;那么您怎能说吃陆龟就等于吃蛇呢?"

这个回答引得在场众人哄堂大笑。参观了其他一些展示区后,斯瓦米吉前往兰梵拉哈玛·巴布设于园中的官舍,在那里饮茶,其他人亦然。斯瓦米吉发现弟子犹豫着不愿与尼维迪塔修女同桌而坐,不愿取食经她触碰过的糕点和茶,便一再劝说他取用,弟子终于被劝动。斯瓦米吉自己饮水,将剩下的水递给弟子喝。此后,围绕达尔文的进化论,展开了一段简短的谈话。

兰梵拉哈玛·巴布:您对达尔文的进化理论及其提出的原因,有何看法?

斯瓦米吉:姑且承认达尔文是对的,但我仍不认为这是关于进化原因的最终结论。

兰梵拉哈玛·巴布:我们国家的古代学者讨论过这个课题吗?

斯瓦米吉:数论哲学(Samkhya Philosophy)对这一课题有精辟的论述。我认为,古印度哲学家的结论,是关于进化原因的最终诠释。

兰梵拉哈玛·巴布:若能以简短的言语加以阐释,我将不胜感激。

斯瓦米吉:你当然知道生存竞争、适者生存、自然选择等法则,西方学者将这些视为低等物种提升为高等物种的原因。然而,帕坦伽利(Patanjali)的体系中,任何这些都未被主张为那种进化的原因。帕坦伽利认为,一个物种向另一物种的转变,是通过"自然的充盈灌注"(梵文原文)来实现的,而非通过持续与障碍的斗争来达成的。在我看来,斗争与竞争有时反而会妨碍一个生命体达到其完美境界。若一种动物的进化是以毁灭另外千种动物为代价的,那么人们不得不承认,这种进化对世界而言贡献甚微。即便承认它有助于肉体上的健康,我们也无法不承认它对精神发展是一种严重的障碍。依照我们国家哲学家的观点,每一个生命体都是一个圆满的灵魂(Soul),而自然进化与显现的多样性,不过是这个灵魂显现程度差异的结果。一旦进化与自然显现的障碍被完全清除,灵魂便圆满地显现出来。无论在自然进化的低层发生着什么,至少在更高的层面,以下说法绝非真理:一个人必须靠不断与障碍斗争才能超越它们。反而可以观察到,在那个层面,障碍会让步,而通过教化与修养、通过专注与冥想,尤其是通过舍弃,灵魂会得到更为充分的显现。因此,将障碍称为灵魂显现的原因而非结果,并将其描述为促成这种奇妙的自然多样性的因素,是不合理性的。试图通过杀死千名作恶者来消除世间之恶,只会增加世间的恶。但若能通过精神教化,使人们停止作恶,世间便再无恶了。现在,请看西方的斗争理论是何等触目惊心!

兰梵拉哈玛·巴布听了斯瓦米吉的话,深感震撼,沉吟片刻后说道:"像您这样精通东西方哲学的人,是印度在当今时刻迫切需要的。唯有这样的人,才能指出那些只见事物一面的受教育者的错误。能够聆听您对进化论如此独到的阐释,我感到极为愉悦。"

不久之后,斯瓦米吉率众人离开,前往巴格巴扎尔(Baghbazar),约在晚上八点到达巴拉拉姆·玻斯(Balaram Bose)的住所。短暂休息后,他来到客厅,那里聚集了一小批人,都渴望详细听闻在动物园中那场谈话的经过。斯瓦米吉进入客厅后,弟子作为在场众人的发言人,提起了那个话题。

弟子:先生,我在动物园里未能完全理解您关于进化论的全部见解。您能否以简明的语言重新阐述一下?

斯瓦米吉:嗯,你没有领会哪些要点?

弟子:您曾多次告诉我们,与外力抗争的能力,构成了生命迹象和迈向进步的第一步。今天您似乎说的恰恰相反。

斯瓦米吉:我为何会说出相反的话?是你没有理解我。在动物界,我们确实清楚地看到生存竞争、适者生存等法则在发挥作用。因此达尔文的理论在某种程度上看来是成立的。但在人类的领域,理性的显现使那里呈现出与那些法则截然相反的情形。例如,在那些我们认为真正伟大或具有理想品格的人身上,我们几乎看不到任何外在的斗争。在动物界,本能占主导;但一个人越是进步,他所显现的理性便越充分。正因如此,理性的人类领域内的进步,不能像动物界那样靠毁灭他人来实现!人类最高层次的进化,只能通过舍弃(sacrifice)来达成。一个人在同类中越伟大,便越能为了他人而舍弃;而在动物界的低层,能杀死最多动物的那个动物才是最强大的。因此,斗争理论并不同样适用于两个领域。人的斗争在精神领域。一个人越能掌控自己的心灵,便越伟大。当心灵的活动完全止息时,真我(Atman)便得以显现。我们在动物界观察到的为维护粗大身体而进行的斗争,在人类存在的层面,则变成了对心灵掌控或达到平衡状态的争取。就如同一棵鲜活的树与其倒映在水塘中的倒影,我们在动物界和人类社会中,发现的是截然相反的斗争方式。

弟子:那么为何您如此大力地倡导我们强健体魄?

斯瓦米吉:嗯,你们还认为自己是人吗?你们只不过有一点点理性——仅此而已。若没有强健的体魄,你们如何与心灵进行斗争?你们是否还配被称为世界上进化程度最高的人——人?除了吃饭、睡觉、满足身体的舒适需求,你们还有什么?感谢上天,你们还没有退化成四足动物!斯瑞·罗摩克里希纳常说:"有尊严意识的人,才是人。"你们不过是经典所描述的那种最低等的虫类存在的活见证——它们只是在出生与死亡之间打转,而不得进入任何更高的层界!你们只是在彼此嫉妒中虚度光阴,成为外国人眼中嫌恶的对象。你们是动物,所以我劝你们去奋斗。先把理论放在一边。只需冷静地反省你们自己日常的行为与对他人的处事,看看你们是否不是一种介于动物与人类存在层面之间的中间物种!首先建立起你们自身的体魄。唯有如此,你们才能获得对心灵的掌控。"纳亚玛特玛·巴拉希内纳·拉布亚:——此真我,不为体弱者所得"(《卡塔奥义书》,I.ii.23)。

弟子:但先生,注释者(商羯罗)将其中的"弱"字解释为"缺乏梵行(Brahmacharya)即贞洁"之意。

斯瓦米吉:随他怎么解释。我说的是:"体质羸弱者,无力证悟真我。"

弟子:但许多头脑迟钝的人也有强健的身体。

斯瓦米吉:若你肯费心给予他们良好的思想,他们将比体质虚弱的人更快地付诸实践。难道你不发现,在体质虚弱的情况下,控制性欲或怒火是极为困难的吗?体弱的人很容易动怒,也很容易被性欲所征服。

弟子:但我们也发现这种规律是有例外的。

斯瓦米吉:谁否认这一点?一旦一个人获得了对心灵的掌控,身体是保持强健还是日渐消瘦,便无关紧要了。问题的关键在于:没有良好的体魄,就无从期望自我证悟。斯瑞·罗摩克里希纳常说:"若身体存在哪怕一点点缺陷,也会妨碍证悟的达成。"

发现斯瓦米吉已然激动起来,弟子不敢再深入这一话题,沉默着接受了斯瓦米吉的观点。片刻之后,斯瓦米吉转向在场的众人说道:"顺便说一句,你们听说了吗,这位'祭司'今天吃了被尼维迪塔触摸过的食物?他吃了她碰过的糕点倒也罢了,但——"他在此转向弟子——"你怎么喝了她碰过的水?"

弟子:但那是您命令我喝的,先生。在导师(Guru)的命令下,我可以做任何事。我本不情愿喝那水。但您喝了,我只能把它当作圣物(Prasada)接受。

斯瓦米吉:好了,你的种姓资格已永远丧失。如今没有人会再尊重你是一个祭司阶层的婆罗门了。

弟子:我不在乎。若您命令我,我甚至可以从贱民家中取食。

这些话让斯瓦米吉和在场的所有人捧腹大笑。

谈话一直持续到午夜过后,弟子才返回自己的住处,却发现门已上锁。于是他只得露宿街头。

时光之轮在其无情的轨道上滚滚向前,如今斯瓦米吉、斯瓦米·瑜伽南达与尼维迪塔修女皆已不在人世。留存下来的,唯有他们生命中圣洁的记忆——而弟子以能够用这样微薄的方式记录下这些回忆,感到自己是幸福的。

## 参考资料

English

Swamiji accompanied by Sister Nivedita, Swami Yogananda, and others has come to visit the Zoological Gardens at Alipur in the afternoon. Rai Rambrahma Sanyal Bahadur, Superintendent of the Gardens, cordially received them and took them round the Gardens. Swamiji, as he went on seeing the various species of animals, casually referred to the Darwinian theory of the gradual evolution of animals. The disciple remembers how, entering the room for snakes, he pointed to a huge python with circular rings on its body, with the remark: "From this the tortoise has evolved in course of time. That very snake, by remaining stationary at one spot for a long time, has gradually turned hard - backed." He further said in fun to the disciple, "You eat tortoises, don't you? Darwin holds that it is this snake that has evolved into the tortoise in the process of time -- then you eat snakes too!" The disciple protested, "Sir, when a thing is metamorphosed into another thing through evolution, it has no more its former shape and habits; then how can you say that eating tortoise means eating snakes also?"

This answer created laughter among the party. After seeing some other things, Swamiji went to Rambrahma Babu's quarters in the Gardens, where he took tea, and others also did the same. Finding that the disciples hesitated to sit at the same table and partake of the sweets and tea which Sister Nivedita had touched, Swamiji repeatedly urged him to take them, which he was induced to do, and drinking water himself, he gave the rest of it to the disciple to drink. After this there was a short conversation on Darwin's evolution theory.

Rambrahma Babu: What is your opinion of the evolution theory of Darwin and the causes he has put forward for it?

Swamiji: Taking for granted that Darwin is right, I cannot yet admit that it is the final conclusion about the causes of evolution.

Rambrahma Babu: Did the ancient scholars of our country discuss this subject?

Swamiji: The subject has been nicely discussed in the Samkhya Philosophy. I am of opinion that the conclusion of the ancient Indian philosophers is the last word on the causes of evolution. Rambrahma Babu: I shall be glad to hear of it, if it can be explained in a few words.

Swamiji: You are certainly aware of the laws of struggle for existence, survival of the fittest, natural selection, and so forth, which have been held by the Western scholars to be the causes of elevating a lower species to a higher. But none of these has been advocated as the cause of that in the system of Patanjali. Patanjali holds that the transformation of one species into another is effected by the "in - filling of nature" [(Sanskrit)]. It is not that this is done by the constant struggle against obstacles. In my opinion, struggle and competition sometimes stand in the way of a being's attaining its perfection. If the evolution of an animal is effected by the destruction of a thousand others, then one must confess that this evolution is doing very little good to the world. Taking it for granted that it conduces to physical well - being, we cannot help admitting that it is a serious obstacle to spiritual development. According to the philosophers of our country, every being is a perfect Soul, and the diversity of evolution and manifestation of nature is simply due to the difference in the degree of manifestation of this Soul. The moment the obstacles to the evolution and manifestation of nature are completely removed, the Soul manifests Itself perfectly. Whatever may happen in the lower strata of nature's evolutions, in the higher strata at any rate, it is not true that it is only by constantly struggling against obstacles that one has to go beyond them. Rather it is observed that there the obstacles give way and a greater manifestation of the Soul takes place through education and culture, through concentration and meditation, and above all through sacrifice. Therefore, to designate the obstacles not as the effects but as the causes of the Soul - manifestation, and describe them as aiding this wonderful diversity of nature, is not consonant with reason. The attempt to remove evil from the world by killing a thousand evil - doers, only adds to the evil in the world. But if the people can be made to desist from evil - doing by means of spiritual instruction, there is no more evil in the world. Now, see how horrible the Western struggle theory becomes!

Rambrahma Babu was astonished to hear Swamiji's words and said at length, "India badly needs at the present moment men well versed in the Eastern and Western philosophies like you. Such men alone are able to point out the mistakes of the educated people who see only one side of the shield. I am extremely delighted to hear your original explanation of the evolution theory."

Shortly after, Swamiji with the party left for Baghbazar and reached Balaram Bose's house at about 8 p.m. After a short rest, he came to the drawing - room, where there was a small gathering, all eager to hear of the conversation at the Zoological Gardens in detail. When Swamiji came to the room, the disciple, as the spokesman of the meeting, raised that very topic.

Disciple: Sir, I have not been able to follow all your remarks about the evolution theory at the Zoo. Will you kindly recapitulate them in simple words?

Swamiji: Why, which points did you fail to grasp?

Disciple: You have often told us that it is the power to struggle with the external forces which constitutes the sign of life and the first step towards improvement. Today you seem to have spoken just the opposite thing.

Swamiji: Why should I speak differently? It was you who could not follow me. In the animal kingdom we really see such laws as struggle for existence, survival of the fittest, etc., evidently at work. Therefore Darwin's theory seems true to a certain extent. But in the human kingdom, where there is the manifestation of rationality, we find just the reverse of those laws. For instance, in those whom we consider really great men or ideal characters, we scarcely observe any external struggle. In the animal kingdom instinct prevails; but the more a man advances, the more he manifests rationality. For this reason, progress in the rational human kingdom cannot be achieved, like that in the animal kingdom, by the destruction of others! The highest evolution of man is effected through sacrifice alone. A man is great among his fellows in proportion as he can sacrifice for the sake of others, while in the lower strata of the animal kingdom, that animal is the strongest which can kill the greatest number of animals. Hence the struggle theory is not equally applicable to both kingdoms. Man's struggle is in the mental sphere. A man is greater in proportion as he can control his mind. When the mind's activities are perfectly at rest, the Atman manifests Itself. The struggle which we observe in the animal kingdom for the preservation of the gross body obtains in the human plane of existence for gaining mastery over the mind or for attaining the state of balance. Like a living tree and its reflection in the water of a tank, we find opposite kinds of struggle in the animal and human kingdoms.

Disciple: Why then do you advocate so much the improvement of our physique?

Swamiji: Well, do you consider yourselves as men? You have got only a bit of rationality -- that's all. How will you struggle with the mind unless the physique be strong? Do you deserve to be called men any longer -- the highest evolution in the world? What have you got besides eating, sleeping, and satisfying the creature - comforts? Thank your stars that you have not developed into quadrupeds yet! Shri Ramakrishna used to say, "He is the man who is conscious of his dignity". You are but standing witnesses to the lowest class of insect - like existence of which the scripture speaks, that they simply undergo the round of births and deaths without being allowed to go to any of the higher spheres! You are simply living a life of jealousy among yourselves and are objects of hatred in the eyes of the foreigner. You are animals, therefore I recommend you to struggle. Leave aside theories and all that. Just reflect calmly on your own everyday acts and dealings with others and find out whether you are not a species of beings intermediate between the animal and human planes of existence! First build up your own physique. Then only you can get control over the mind. "नायमात्मा बलहीनेन लभ्य:-- this Self is not to be attained by the weak" (Katha Upanishad, I.ii.23).

Disciple: But, sir, the commentator (Shankara) has interpreted the word "weak" to mean "devoid of Brahmacharya or continence".

Swamiji: Let him. I say, "The physically weak are unfit for the realisation of the Self."

Disciple: But many dull - headed persons also have strong bodies.

Swamiji: If you can take the pains to give them good ideas once, they will be able to work them out sooner than physically unfit people. Don't you find that in a weak physique it is difficult to control the sex - appetite or anger? Lean people are quickly incensed and are quickly overcome by the sex - instinct.

Disciple: But we find exceptions to the rule also.

Swamiji: Who denies it? Once a person gets control over the mind, it matters little whether the body remains strong or becomes emaciated. The gist of the thing is that unless one has a good physique one can never aspire to Self - realisation. Shri Ramakrishna used to say, "One fails to attain realisation if there be but a slight defect in the body".

Finding that Swamiji had grown excited, the disciple did not dare to push the topic further, but remained quiet accepting Swamiji's view. Shortly after, Swamiji, addressing those present, said, "By the bye, have you heard that this `priest' has today taken food which was touched by Nivedita? That he took the sweets touched by her did not matter so much, but -- here he addressed the disciple --"how did you drink the water she had touched?"

Disciple: But it was you, sir, who ordered me to do so. Under the Guru's orders I can do anything. I was unwilling to drink the water though. But you drank it and I had to take it as Prasada.

Swamiji: Well, your caste is gone for ever. Now nobody will respect you as a Brahmin of the priest class.

Disciple: I don't care if they do not. I can take the rice from the house of a Pariah if you order me to.

These words set Swamiji and all those present in a roar of laughter.

The conversation lasted till it was past midnight, when the disciple came back to his lodging, only to find it bolted. So he had to pass the night out of doors.

The wheel of Time has rolled on in its unrelenting course, and Swamiji, Swami Yogananda, and Sister Nivedita are now no more on earth. Only the sacred memory of their lives remains -- and the disciple considers himself blessed to be able to record, in ever so meagre a way, these reminiscences.

## References


文本来自Wikisource公共领域。原版由阿德瓦伊塔修道院出版。