辨喜文献馆

卷6 conversation
2,764 字数 · 11 分钟阅读 · Conversations and Dialogues

本译文由人工智能辅助工具生成,可能存在不准确之处。如需查阅权威文本,请参考英文原文。

AI-translated. May contain errors. For accurate text, refer to the original English.

中文

(译自孟加拉语)

(摘自一位弟子的日记)

(该弟子为夏拉特旃陀罗·查克拉瓦蒂,他以孟加拉语出版了其记录,书名为《师徒对话录》,分为上下两册。本系列"对话与交谈"即为该书的修订译本。本系列中已有五篇对话收录于《全集》第五卷。)

【地点:加尔各答。时间:一八九七年。】

在过去十天里,弟子一直跟随斯瓦米吉研读赛衍那对《梨俱吠陀》的注释。斯瓦米吉当时寄住在巴格巴扎尔已故巴拉拉姆·鲍斯家中。麦克斯·缪勒的《梨俱吠陀》卷本系从一位富有友人的私人藏书中借来。斯瓦米吉不时纠正弟子,并在必要时指导正确的发音或文法构造。有时在阐释赛衍那关于吠陀永恒性的论证时,斯瓦米吉对这位注释家非凡的才思大加赞赏;有时在深入探讨教义更深层含义的辩论中,他又提出不同的见解,并对赛衍那善意地调侃几句。

我们的研读如此进行了一段时间后,斯瓦米吉提起了关于麦克斯·缪勒的话题,接着说道:你知道吗,我的印象是,赛衍那转世为麦克斯·缪勒,以复兴他自己对吠陀的注释。这个想法我由来已久。在见到麦克斯·缪勒之后,这个想法在我心中似乎得到了确认。即使在我们这个国家,你也找不到一位如此坚持不懈、对吠陀和吠檀多功底如此深厚的学者。除此之外,他对室利罗摩克里希纳怀有何等深邃、不可测度的敬仰!你知道吗,他相信他是神的化身!当我作客他家时,他给予我何等盛情的款待!看到这位老人和他的夫人,我觉得他们的家庭生活简直就像婆私吒和阿伦达蒂一般!在与我分别时,老人眼中涌出了泪水。

弟子:但是,先生,如果赛衍那本人转世为麦克斯·缪勒,那他为何投生为一个蔑戾车,而非生于印度这片神圣的土地?

斯瓦米吉:"我是雅利安人,他人是蔑戾车"——这种情感和区别来自无明。但对于一位吠陀注释家、知识的光辉化身而言,种姓阶级和种姓划分又有何意义?对他来说,这些完全毫无意义,他可以随意在任何地方投生为人,以造福人类。尤其是,如果他不选择投生在一个学术与财富皆为杰出的国度,他又从何处筹措出版如此巨帙的庞大费用?你难道没听说东印度公司为出版《梨俱吠陀》支付了九十万卢比的现金吗?即便这笔钱也还不够。还得在这个国家按月聘请数百位吠陀学者。在这个时代,在这个国家,有谁见过如此深切的求知渴望,如此巨大的为光明与学问而投入的资金?麦克斯·缪勒本人在他的序言中写道,他用了二十五年的时间仅仅准备手稿。然后印刷又花了二十年!一个普通人不可能将他一生中四十五年的时光耗费在一部著作上。想想看!我说他就是赛衍那本人,这难道是我的空想吗?

这番关于麦克斯·缪勒的谈话之后,吠陀的研读继续进行。此时斯瓦米吉开始从多方面支持赛衍那关于创造由吠陀而生的观点。他说道:吠陀意味着永恒真理的总和;吠陀的仙人们体验了这些真理;这些真理只有超感官的见者才能体验,而非我们这样的凡夫。因此在吠陀中,"仙人"一词意为"真言真理的见者",而非仅仅是脖子上挂着圣线的婆罗门。社会的种姓划分是后来才出现的。吠陀的本质是声(Shabda)或理念。它不过是理念的总和。按照这个术语古老的吠陀含义,声是微细的理念,它后来通过显化为粗重的形式而自我呈现。因此由于创造的消融,未来创造的微细种子蕴藏于吠陀之中。相应地,在往世书中你会发现,在第一次神圣化身——鱼化身(Minavatara)中,吠陀首先被显明。吠陀在此化身中首先被揭示,其后其他创造性的显化随之而来。换言之,一切被创造的事物开始从吠陀中的声或理念取得具体的形态。因为在声或理念中,一切粗重的事物都有其微细的形式。在以往所有的循环或劫(Kalpa)中,创造都以相同的方式进行。这在吠陀的三昧耶真言中可以找到:

"सूर्याचन्द्रमसौ धाता यथापूर्वमकल्पयत् पृथिवीं दिवं चान्तरीक्षमथो स्वः——造物主以与前劫相同的方式和过程,投射出了太阳、月亮、大地、大气、天空和更高的领域。"你理解了吗?

弟子:但是,先生,在没有实际具体事物存在的情况下,声或理念如何能被运用?又用于何处?名称又如何能够被赋予?

斯瓦米吉:是的,初看之下这似乎确实是个难题。但你想想这个。假设这个水壶碎成了碎片;水壶的理念是否就变得空无?不是的。因为水壶是粗重的果,而"水壶"这个理念是水壶的微细状态或声的状态。同样地,每一个事物的声状态就是它的微细状态,而我们以任何方式所看到的、听到的、触摸到的或感知到的事物,都是那些处于微细或声状态的实体的粗重显化。正如我们谈论果与因的关系一样。即使整个创造被湮灭,作为宇宙意识或一切具体事物微细实在的声,仍然作为因存在于梵之中。在创造显化之际,这个因的实体总和可以说振动而活跃起来,并且作为这一切的有声的物质基础,"唵"这个永恒的、原初的声音不断从自身之中流出。然后,从因的总体中首先生出每一特定事物的微细形象或声形式,继而生出其粗重显化。那个因性的声,即语词意识,就是梵,它就是吠陀。这便是赛衍那的要旨。你现在理解了吗?

弟子:不,先生,我不能清楚地理解。

斯瓦米吉:好吧,我想你明白,即使宇宙中所有的水壶都被毁灭了,"水壶"这个理念或声仍然会存在。那么如果宇宙被毁灭——我是说如果构成宇宙的一切事物都化为原子——为什么在意识中代表它们全部的理念或声不能仍然存在?为什么不能设想第二次创造在适当的时候从中产生?

弟子:但是,先生,如果一个人喊"水壶""水壶",这并不会导致任何水壶被制造出来!

斯瓦米吉:不,如果你或我那样喊叫,什么也不会产生;但如果水壶的理念升起于梵之中——那个在创造性决断上完满的梵——水壶就必定会显现。当我们看到即使是那些安住于宗教修行中的修行者都能凭意志力促成本来不可能发生的事情时,更何况是具有完美创造意志的梵呢?在创造之际,梵显化为声(理念),然后取得"那达"或"唵"的形式。在下一阶段,那些在以往循环中以各种方式存在的特定的声或理念——如地界(Bhuh)、空界(Bhuvah)、天界(Svah)、牛、人等——开始从"唵"中生出。一旦这些理念出现在具有完美意志的梵之中,相应的具体事物也随之出现,宇宙的多样性逐渐显化。你现在明白声是如何成为创造之源了吗?

弟子:是的,我刚形成一些概念,但心中尚无清晰的理解。

斯瓦米吉:要知道,清晰的理解、内在的证悟,可不是小事,孩子。当心灵趋向于在梵中自我消融时,它会一个接一个地经过所有这些阶段,最终达到绝对的(无分别)状态。在进入三摩地的过程中,首先宇宙呈现为一团理念;然后整个事物消融于一个深邃的"唵"之中。接着连那个也消融了,连那个也似乎介于有与无之间。那就是永恒那达(Nada)的体验。然后心灵消融于梵的实在之中,于是一切完成!一切皆是寂静!

弟子静默而坐,心想除非这一切都是自身的亲证体验,否则无人能像斯瓦米吉这样表达和阐释。

斯瓦米吉随后继续这个话题:如神的化身这样的伟人,从三摩地返回到"我"与"我的"的领域时,首先体验到未显的那达,那达逐渐变得清晰而呈现为唵,然后从唵声中,宇宙作为一团理念的微细形式被体验到,最后物质宇宙进入感知。但普通的修行者经过极大的努力才能超越那达,而一旦他们证悟了梵的直接实在,便无法再回到物质感知的低层面。他们融入梵中,"क्षीरे नीरवत्——如水融入乳中"。

当这一切关于创造理论的谈话正在进行时,伟大的剧作家吉里什旃陀罗·高什先生出现了。斯瓦米吉向他致以礼貌的问候,然后继续对弟子的教导。

声又分为两类:吠陀的声和世俗人类使用的声。我在名为《声力明论》的正理派著作中发现了这一论点。其中的论证无疑显示出伟大的思想力量;但那些术语实在令人头脑混乱!

随后转向吉里什先生,斯瓦米吉说:你怎么看,吉里什?好吧,你不在意研究这一切,你整天忙于对这位和那位神明的礼拜,是吗?

吉里什先生:我研究什么呢,兄弟?我既没有时间也没有足够的理解力来探究这一切。但这一次,凭着室利罗摩克里希纳的恩典,我将向你的吠陀和吠檀多致以敬意后一跃而过,直抵那遥远的彼岸!他让你研读这一切,是因为他要借你之手成就许多事情。但我们无此需要。说完此话,吉里什先生一再以头触碰那几大卷《梨俱吠陀》,口中念道:"以吠陀之身显现的罗摩克里希纳,全胜!"

斯瓦米吉此时进入了一种深沉的冥想状态,吉里什先生突然唤他道:喂,请听我说。你在吠陀和吠檀多方面做了大量研究,但告诉我,你有没有在其中找到任何途径,能使我们摆脱这个国家如此深重的苦难、如此悲痛的哀号、如此普遍的饥饿、如此频繁的通奸罪行以及诸多可怖的罪恶?

说着,他反复描绘社会的可怖景象。斯瓦米吉保持完全的沉默与无语,而在想到他同胞的悲苦与苦难时,泪水开始从他眼中流出,似乎为了向我们掩饰他的感受,他起身离开了房间。

此时,吉里什先生转向弟子说道:你看到了吗,孟加拉人?何等伟大的慈悲之心!我尊崇你的斯瓦米吉,并非仅仅因为他是精通吠陀的学者;我尊崇他是因为他那伟大的心灵——正是这颗心使他因同胞的苦难而退下落泪。

弟子和吉里什先生随后开始彼此交谈,后者论证知识和爱最终是同一的。

在此期间,斯瓦米吉返回并问弟子:"刚才你们在谈些什么?"弟子说:"先生,我们在谈论吠陀,而奇妙的是,我们的吉里什先生虽然没有研读过这些典籍,却以清晰的精确把握了终极真理!"

斯瓦米吉:一切真理都会向真正虔诚于古鲁的人自行揭示;他几乎不需要研读。但这样的虔诚和信仰在这个世界上极为罕见。如我们这位朋友这般具有如此程度虔诚的人,无需研读经典。但若有人急于效仿他的方式,只会招致自身的毁灭。永远听从他的忠告,但切勿试图模仿他的方式。

弟子:是的,先生。

斯瓦米吉:不要只是附和!要清楚地把握我说的话。不要像傻瓜一样对所听到的一切都点头称是。即使是我宣说的事情,也不要盲目信从。首先要清楚地把握,然后才接受。室利罗摩克里希纳总是坚持要我在清楚理解他的每一句话之后才接受。在你的道路上行走时,只遵循正确的原理、清晰的推理和经典所共同宣示为真的东西。如此通过不断的反思,智力将变得清明,然后梵才能在其中映现。你明白吗?

弟子:是的,先生,我明白。但不同的人有不同的见解,令头脑困惑。就在刚才,吉里什先生还对我说"你研究这一切有什么用?"然后你来了又说"要对你所听到和读到的进行反思。"那我到底该怎么做?

斯瓦米吉:他和我给你的建议都是正确的。唯一的区别在于,两人的建议是从不同的立场出发的。有一种灵性生活的境界,在那里一切推理都归于沉寂——"मूकास्वादनवत्——如哑者品味美食一般"。还有另一种灵性生活的方式,在其中必须通过追随经典的学习、研读和教授来证悟真理。你必须通过研读和反思来前进,那才是你证悟的道路。你明白了吗?

从斯瓦米吉那里得到如此教诲后,弟子愚蠢地以为这意味着吉里什先生的观点被否定了,于是转向他说:"您听到了吗,先生?斯瓦米吉对我的建议显然就是研读和反思吠陀与吠檀多。"

吉里什先生:好吧,你就照着做吧;有斯瓦米吉的祝福,你确实会在那条路上取得成功。

斯瓦米·萨达南达此时到达,看到他,斯瓦米吉立即说道:"你知道吗,刚才吉里什先生描绘的我们国家的苦难景象使我心痛不已;你能为我们的国家做些什么吗?"

萨达南达:尊者,只要一声令下;您的仆人已经准备好了。

斯瓦米吉:首先,以相当小的规模开办一个救济中心,让贫困和受苦的人能够得到救助,让病患能够得到护理。在那里,无论信仰或肤色如何,无依无靠的人都将得到救济和服务,你明白吗?

萨达南达:全依您的吩咐,先生。

斯瓦米吉:没有比服务众生更高的法了。如果这种法能以真正的精神来实践,那么"मुक्तिः करफलायते——解脱就如掌中之果一般唾手可得"。

现在转向吉里什先生,斯瓦米吉说道:"你知道吗,吉里什先生,我心中浮现的念头是,即使为了解除世间的苦难而必须经历千次转生,我也一定会去经历。如果通过我这样做,哪怕一个灵魂的悲苦能稍减一分,我也愿意去做。好吧,只求自己解脱又有什么用?应当带着一切众生同登解脱之路。你能说出为什么这样的感受总是最先浮现在我心中吗?"

吉里什先生:啊,不然的话,室利罗摩克里希纳为何要宣称你在灵性能力上超越一切人呢?

说完此话,吉里什先生向我们所有人告别,因有事务需前往别处。

English

IX

(Translated from Bengali)

(From the Diary of a Disciple)

(The disciple is Sharatchandra Chakravarty, who published his records in a Bengali book, Swami-Shishya-Samvâda, in two parts. The present series of "Conversations and Dialogues" is a revised translation from this book. Five dialogues of this series have already appeared in the Complete Works,Volume 5)

[Place: Calcutta. year: 1897.]

For the last ten days, the disciple had been studying Sâyana's commentary on the Rig-Veda with Swamiji, who was staying then at the house of the late Babu Balaram Bose at Baghbazar. Max Müller's volumes on the Rig-Veda had been brought from a wealthy friend's private library. Swamiji was correcting the disciple every now and then and giving him the true pronunciation or construction as necessary. Sometimes while explaining the arguments of Sayana to establish the eternity of the Vedas, Swamiji was praising very highly the commentator's wonderful ingenuity; sometimes again while arguing out the deeper significance of the doctrine, he was putting forward a difference in view and indulging in an innocent squib at Sayana.

While our study had proceeded thus for a while, Swamiji raised the topic about Max Müller and continued thus: Well, do you know, my impression is that it is Sayana who is born again as Max Müller to revive his own commentary on the Vedas? I have had this notion for long. It became confirmed in my mind, it seems, after I had seen Max Müller. Even here in this country, you don't find a scholar so persevering, and so firmly grounded in the Vedas and the Vedanta. Over and above this, what a deep, unfathomable respect for Sri Ramakrishna! Do you know, he believes in his Divine Incarnation! And what great hospitality towards me when I was his guest! Seeing the old man and his lady, it seemed to me that they were living their home-life like another Vasishtha and Arundhati! At the time of parting with me, tears came into the eyes of the old man.

Disciple: But, sir, if Sayana himself became Max Müller, then why was he born as a Mlechchha instead of being born in the sacred land of India?

Swamiji: The feeling and the distinction that I am an Aryan and the other is a Mlechchha come from ignorance. But what are Varnâshrama and caste divisions to one who is the commentator of the Vedas, the shining embodiment of knowledge? To him they are wholly meaningless, and he can assume human birth wherever he likes for doing good to mankind. Specially, if he did not choose to be born in a land which excelled both in learning and wealth, where would he secure the large expenses for publishing such stupendous volumes? Didn't you hear that the East India Company paid nine lakhs of rupees in cash to have the Rig-Veda published? Even this money was not enough. Hundreds of Vedic Pundits had to be employed in this country on monthly stipends. Has anybody seen in this age, here in this country, such profound yearning for knowledge, such prodigious investment of money for the sake of light and learning? Max Müller himself has written it in his preface, that for twenty-five years he prepared only the manuscripts. Then the printing took another twenty years! It is not possible for an ordinary man to drudge for fortyfive years of his life with one publication. Just think of it! Is it an idle fancy of mine to say he is Sayana himself?

After this talk about Max Müller the leading of the Vedas was resumed. Now Swamiji began variously to support the view of Sayana that creation proceeded out of the Vedas. He said: Veda means the sum total of eternal truths; the Vedic Rishis experienced those truths; they can be experienced only by seers of the supersensuous and not by common men like us. That is why in the Vedas the term Rishi means "the seer of the truth of the Mantras", and not any Brahmin with the holy thread hanging down the neck. The division of society into castes came about later on. Veda is of the nature of Shabda or of idea. It is but the sum total of ideas. Shabda, according to the old Vedic meaning of the term, is the subtle idea, which reveals itself by taking the gross form later on. So owing to the dissolution of the creation the subtle seeds of the future creation become involved in the Veda. Accordingly, in the Puranas you find that during the first Divine Incarnation, the Minâvatâra, the Veda is first made manifest. The Vedas having been first revealed in this Incarnation, the other creative manifestations followed. Or in other words, all the created objects began to take concrete shape out of the Shabdas or ideas in the Veda. For in Shabda or idea, all gross objects have their subtle forms. Creation had proceeded in the same way in all previous cycles or Kalpas. This you find in the Sandhyâ Mantra of the Vedas:

" सूर्याचन्द्रमसौ धाता यथापूर्वमकल्पयत् पृथिवीं दिवं चान्तरीक्षमथो स्वः — The Creator projected the sun, the moon, the earth, the atmosphere, the heaven, and the upper spheres in the same manner and process as in previous cycles." Do you understand?

Disciple: But, sir, how in the absence of an actual concrete object can the Shabda or idea be applied and for what? And how can the names too be given at all?

Swamiji: Yes. that is what on first thought seems to be the difficulty. But just think of this. Supposing this jug breaks into pieces; does the idea of a jug become null and void? No. Because, the jug is the gross effect, while the idea, "jug", is the subtle state or the Shabda-state of the jug. In the same way, the Shabda-state of every object is its subtle state, and the things we see, hear, touch, or perceive in any manner are the gross manifestations of entities in the subtle or Shabda-state. Just as we may speak of the effect and its cause. Even when the whole creation is annihilated, the Shabda, as the consciousness of the universe or the subtle reality of all concrete things, exists in Brahman as the cause. At the point of creative manifestation, this sum total of causal entities vibrates into activity, as it were, and as being the sonant, material substance of it all, the eternal, primal sound of "Om" continues to come out of itself. And then from the causal totality comes out first the subtle image or Shabda-form of each particular thing and then its gross manifestation. Now that causal Shabda, or word-consciousness, is Brahman, and it is the Veda. This is the purport of Sayana. Do you now understand?

Disciple: No, sir, I can't clearly comprehend it.

Swamiji: Well, you understand, I suppose, that even if all the jugs in the universe were to be destroyed, the idea or Shabda, "jug", would still exist. So if the universe be destroyed — I mean if all the things making up the universe be smashed to atoms — why should not the ideas or Shabdas representing all of them in consciousness, be still existing; And why cannot a second creation be supposed to come out of them in time?

Disciple: But, sir, if one cries out "jug", "jug", that does not cause any jug to be produced!

Swamiji: No, nothing is produced if you or I cry out like that; but a jug must be revealed if the idea of it rises in Brahman which is perfect in Its creative determinations. When we see even those established in the practice of religion (Sâdhakas) bring about by will-power things otherwise impossible to happen, what to speak of Brahman with perfect creativeness of will? At the point of creation Brahman becomes manifest as Shabda (Idea), and then assumes the form of "Nâda" or "Om". At the next stage, the particular Shabdas or ideas, that variously existed in former cycles, such as Bhuh, Bhuvah, Svah, cow, man, etc., begin to come out of the "Om". As soon as these ideas appear in Brahman endowed with perfect will, the corresponding concrete things also appear, and gradually the diversified universe becomes manifest. Do you now understand how Shabda is the source of creation?

Disciple: Yes, I just form some idea of it, but there is no clear comprehension in the mind.

Swamiji: Well, clear comprehension, inward realisation, is no small matter, my son. When the mind proceeds towards self-absorption in Brahman, it passes through all these stages one by one to reach the absolute (Nirvikalpa) state at last. In the process of entering into Samadhi, first the universe appears as one mass of ideas; then the whole thing loses itself in a profound "Om". Then even that melts away, even that seems to be between being and non-being. That is the experience of the eternal Nada. And then the mind becomes lost in the Reality of Brahman, and then it is done! All is peace!

The disciple sat mute, thinking that none could express and explain it in the way Swamiji was doing, unless the whole thing were a matter of one's own experience!

Swamiji then resumed the subject: Great men like Avatâras, in coming back from Samadhi to the realm of "I" and "mine", first experience the unmanifest Nada, which by degrees grows distinct and appears as Om, and then from Omkâra, the subtle form of the universe as a mass of ideas becomes experienced, and last, the material universe comes into perception. But ordinary Sadhakas somehow reach beyond Nada through immense practice, and when once they attain to the direct realisation of Brahman, they cannot again come back to the lower plane of material perception. They melt away in Brahman, "क्षीरे नीरवत् — Like water in milk".

When all this talk on the theory of creation was going on, the great dramatist, Babu Girish Chandra Ghosh, appeared on the scene. Swamiji gave him his courteous greetings and continued his lessons to the disciple.

Shabdas are again divided into two classes, the Vedic Shabdas and those in common human use. I found this position in the Nyâya book called Shabdashaktiprakâshikâ. There the arguments no doubt indicate great power of thought; but, oh, the terminology confounds the brain!

Now turning to Girish Babu Swamiji said: What do you say, G. C.? Well, you do not care to study all this, you pass your days with your adoration of this and that god, eh?

Girish Babu: What shall I study, brother? I have neither time nor understanding enough to pry into all that. But this time, with Shri Ramakrishna's grace, I shall pass by with greetings to your Vedas and Vedanta, and take one leap to the far beyond! He gets you through all these studies, because he wants to get many a thing done by you. But we have no need of them. Saying this, Girish Babu again and again touched the big Rig-Veda volumes with his head, uttering, "All Victory to Ramakrishna in the form of Veda!"

Swamiji was now in a sort of deep reverie, when Girish Babu suddenly called out to him and said: Well, hear me, please. A good deal of study you have made in the Vedas and Vedanta, but say, did you find anywhere in them any way for us out of all these profound miseries in the country, all these wailings of grief, all this starvation, all these crimes of adultery, and the many horrible sins?

Saying this he painted over and over again the horrid pictures of society. Swamiji remained perfectly quiet and speechless, while at the thought of the sorrows and miseries of his fellow men, tears began to flow out of his eyes, and seemingly to hide his feelings from us, he rose and left the room.

Meanwhile, addressing the disciple, Girish Babu said: Did you see, Bângâl? What a great loving heart! I don't honour your Swamiji simply for being a Pundit versed in the Vedas; but I honour him for that great heart of his which just made him retire weeping at the sorrows of his fellow beings.

The disciple and Girish Babu then went on conversing with each other, the latter proving that knowledge and love were ultimately the same.

In the meantime, Swamiji returned and asked the disciple, "Well, what was all this talk going on between you?" The disciple said, "Sir, we are talking about the Vedas, and the wonder of it is that our Girish Babu has not studied these books but has grasped the ultimate truths with clean precision!"

Swamiji: All truths reveal themselves to him who has got real devotion to the Guru; he has hardly any need of studies. But such devotion and faith are very rare in this world. He who possesses those in the measure of our friend here need not study the Shastras. But he who rushes forward to imitate him will only bring about his own ruin. Always follow his advice, but never attempt to imitate his ways.

Disciple: Yes, sir,

Swamiji: No saying ditto merely! Do grasp dearly the words I say. Don't nod assent like a fool to everything said. Don't put implicit faith, even if I declare something. First clearly grasp and then accept. Shri Ramakrishna always used to insist on my accepting every word of his only after dear comprehension of it. Walk on your path, only with what sound principle, clear reasoning, and scripture all declare as true. Thus by constant reflection, the intellect will become dear, and then only can Brahman be reflected therein. Do you understand?

Disciple: Yes, sir, I do. But the brain gets puzzled with the different views of different men. This very moment I was being told by Girish Babu, "What will you do with all this studying?" And then you come and say, "Reflect on what you hear and read about." So what exactly am I to do?

Swamiji: Both what he and I have advised you are true. The only difference is that the advice of both has been given from different standpoints. There is a stage of spiritual life where all reasonings are hushed; " मूकास्वादनवत् — Like some delicious taste enjoyed by the dumb". And there is another mode of spiritual life in which one has to realise the Truth through the pursuit of scriptural learning, through studying and teaching. You have to proceed through studies and reflection, that is your way to realisation. Do you see?

Receiving such a mandate from Swamiji, the disciple in his folly took it to imply Girish Babu's discomfiture, and so turning towards him said: "Do you hear, sir? Swamiji's advice to me plainly is just to study and reflect on the Vedas and Vedanta."

Girish Babu: Well, you go on doing so; with Swamiji's blessings, you will, indeed, succeed in that way.

Swami Sadananda arrived there at that moment, and seeing him, Swamiji at once said, "Do you know, my heart is sorely troubled by the picture of our country's miseries G. C. was depicting just now; well, can you do anything for our country?"

Sadananda: Mahârâj, let the mandate once go forth; your slave is ready.

Swamiji: First, on a pretty small scale, start a relief centre, where the poor and the distressed may obtain relief and the diseased may be nursed. Helpless people having none to look after them will be relieved and served there, irrespective of creed or colour, do you see?

Sadananda: Just as you command, sir.

Swamiji: There is no greater Dharma than this service of living beings. If this Dharma can be practiced in the real spirit, then " मुक्तिः करफलायते — Liberation comes as a fruit on the very palm of one's hand".

Addressing Girish Babu now, Swamiji said, "Do you know, Girish Babu, it occurs to me that even if a thousand births have to be taken in order to relieve the sorrows of the world, surely I will take them. If by my doing that, even a single soul may have a little bit of his grief relieved, why, I will do it. Well, what avails it all to have only one's own liberation? All men should be taken along with oneself on that way. Can you say why a feeling like this comes up foremost in my mind?

Girish Babu: Ah, otherwise why should Shri Ramakrishna declare you to be greater than all others in spiritual competence?

Saying this, Girish Babu took leave of us all to go elsewhere on some business.


文本来自Wikisource公共领域。原版由阿德瓦伊塔修道院出版。