三十一
本译文由人工智能辅助工具生成,可能存在不准确之处。如需查阅权威文本,请参考英文原文。
AI-translated. May contain errors. For accurate text, refer to the original English.
中文
斯瓦米吉:今天发生了一件很有趣的事。我去了一位朋友家。他请人画了一幅画,题材是"在俱卢之野的战场上,室利·克里希纳(Krishna)向阿周那(Arjuna)训诫"。室利·克里希纳站在战车上,手持缰绳,向阿周那宣说《薄伽梵歌》(Bhagavad Gita)。他给我看了这幅画,问我喜不喜欢。我说:"还过得去。"但他坚持要我提出批评意见,我只好坦诚地说:"这幅画没有什么值得称道之处;首先,室利·克里希纳时代的战车并不像现代的塔形花车,其次,室利·克里希纳的形象中也没有任何神情表达。"
问:那时候塔形战车还没有使用吗?
斯瓦米吉:难道你不知道,自佛教时代以来,我们国家的一切都陷入了极大的混乱之中?国王们从未在塔形战车上征战。在拉贾斯坦邦至今仍有战车,与古代战车颇为相似。你见过希腊神话图画中的战车吗?那种车有两只轮子,从后面登上去;我们古代的战车正是那种样式。若细节有误,画一幅画又有何意义?一幅历史画作要达到卓越的标准,需要进行适当的研究与考证,将事物精确地描绘成那个时代的样子。真实必须得到呈现,否则这幅画便毫无价值。如今,我们那些学画的年轻人,大多是在学校里不成功、在家里被视为无所用处而打发去学画的人;你能期待他们创作出什么艺术作品?要画出一幅真正优秀的画,所需的才华不亚于创作一部完美的戏剧。
问:那么,在那幅画中,室利·克里希纳应当如何表现?
斯瓦米吉:室利·克里希纳应当如他本来的样子被描绘——《薄伽梵歌》的人格化;当他向已被迷惑与怯懦所征服的阿周那传授正法(Dharma)之道时,《薄伽梵歌》的核心思想应从他整个形象中焕发出来。
说完这些,斯瓦米吉做出一个姿势,示范室利·克里希纳应当如何被描绘,并继续说道:"你看,他就是这样握住马的缰绳——握得如此之紧,使得马匹被拉到后腿跪地,前蹄腾空,口大张开。这将在室利·克里希纳的形象中展现出惊人的动感力量。他的友人,举世闻名的英雄,已将弓箭抛在一旁,像个懦夫一样在两军阵前瘫倒在战车上。而室利·克里希纳,一手持鞭,另一只手收紧缰绳,转向阿周那,他那孩童般的面容焕发着超凡的爱与同情,神情宁静安详——向他挚爱的战友传递《薄伽梵歌》的讯息。现在请告诉我,这幅《薄伽梵歌》传道者的画面向你传达了什么样的意念。"
那位朋友:活力与坚定和宁静的结合。
斯瓦米吉:正是!整个身体中有强烈的行动力,而面容上却映照着蓝天般深邃的宁静与安详。这就是《薄伽梵歌》的核心思想——在任何境况下都保持平静与坚定,以身心灵完全专注于他的神圣足莲!
【梵文】(《薄伽梵歌》第四章第十八颂)
即便在行动之中,心灵仍能保持宁静,而即便无外在行动之时,仍有对梵(Brahman)冥思之流在内在流淌——此人才是人中的智者,他才是真正的瑜伽(Yoga)行者,他才是完美的工作者。
此时,被派去安排船只的人回来说船已准备好;于是斯瓦米吉对朋友说:"现在我们去道场吧。你一定已托人在家中留言说要陪我去那里了吧?"
他们边走向船只边继续交谈。
斯瓦米吉:这一思想必须向每一个人宣讲——工作,工作,无尽的工作——不计结果,同时始终将整个身心坚定地专注于神的莲足!
问:但这不就是业瑜伽(Karma-yoga)吗?
斯瓦米吉:是的,这就是业瑜伽;但若无灵修,你永远无法实践这业瑜伽。你必须将四种不同的瑜伽和谐地统一起来;否则你如何能始终将心灵与心志完全专注于神?
问:人们通常说,依照《薄伽梵歌》的行动是指履行吠陀祭祀和宗教仪式;任何其他种类的行动都是徒然的。
斯瓦米吉:好吧;但你必须将这理解得更为宽广。谁要为你所做的每一个行动、你所呼的每一口气、你所想的每一个念头负责?难道不是你自己吗?
那位朋友:是,也不是。我对此无法清晰地解决。其真相是,人是工具,神才是施动者。所以当我受他的意志指引时,我对自己的行动完全没有责任。
斯瓦米吉:好,那种话只能在最高的证悟境界说。当心灵通过行动得到净化,你看见是他在使一切运作,那时你才有权利这样说。否则一切都是废话,不过是空泛的套话而已。
问:为什么这样说呢?若一个人通过推理真正确信,一切行动皆是由神所驱使,那不是可以的吗?
斯瓦米吉:也许在一个人真正确信的时候是成立的。但那不过是在那一刻有效,此后便荡然无存了。好好想想这一点,你在日常生活中所做的一切,难道不是带着"我自己就是施动者"的自我意识在做的吗?
你能记住是神在使你工作多长时间?但若反复如此分析,你将进入一种自我消融而神临其中的境界。那时你才能理所当然地说:"主啊,你在内里守护着我的一切行动。"但是,我的朋友,若自我占据了你心中所有的空间,神又在哪里容身呢?神确实缺席了!
问:但难道恶的冲动不是他给予我的吗?
斯瓦米吉:不,绝非如此。认为神在驱使你作恶,是对神的亵渎。他并非在煽动你做恶事,那一切都是你自私的欲望所造成的。若一个人说神在使一切发生,而故意坚持作恶,这只会给他带来灾祸。这就是自欺的根源。难道你做了一件好事之后没有感到一种欣喜?你会将做好事的功劳归于自己——你不由自主,这是非常人性的。但把行善的功劳归于自己,把行恶的罪责推给神,这是多么荒唐!这是一种极为危险的观念——是消化不良的《薄伽梵歌》与吠檀多(Vedanta)的后遗症。永远不要持有这种观点。不如说,是他在使善行得以完成,而恶行的责任在你自己。这将带来虔信(Bhakti)与信心,你将在每一步都见到他的恩典显现。其真相是,没有人创造了你——是你创造了你自己。这是辨别(Viveka),这就是吠檀多。但在证悟之前,人不会理解这一点。因此,修行者应从二元论的立场出发,即神在使好的行动发生,而恶行是自己做的。这是净化心灵的最简便方法。因此你会发现二元论在毗湿奴派(Vaishnavas)中如此有力。从一开始便持不二(Advaita)的思想是非常困难的。但二元论的立场逐渐导向不二的证悟。
虚伪始终是危险的。若没有故意的自欺——也就是说,若一个人真诚地相信连最邪恶的冲动也是由神所驱动的——可以肯定,他不必长期继续那些卑鄙的行为。心灵的一切不净得到迅速的净化。我们古代的经典作者深谙此理。我认为密宗(Tantrika)的礼拜形式,起源于佛教开始衰落之时,在佛教信徒的压迫下,人们不得不秘密进行吠陀祭祀的时候。他们不再有机会连续进行两个月的祭祀,于是他们用黏土塑像,加以礼拜,再将其投入水中——将一切在一夜之间完成,不留任何痕迹!人的心灵渴望具体的象征,否则心灵得不到满足。于是在每一个家庭中,这种一夜祭祀开始流行。正如室利·罗摩克里希纳常说的:"有人从清道夫的入口进入房屋。"那个时代的灵性导师们认识到,那些因邪恶倾向而无法履行任何宗教仪式的人,也需要一条逐渐回归善道的路径。正是为了他们,那些奇特的密宗仪式被发明出来。
问:他们将恶的行动视为善而继续行之。那么这如何能消除他们的邪恶倾向呢?
斯瓦米吉:他们将那些倾向导向了一个不同的方向;他们照样去做,但目的是为了证悟神。
问:这真的能做到吗?
斯瓦米吉:效果是相同的。动机必须是正确的。有什么能阻止他们成功呢?
问:但许多人在尝试这样的方式时,陷入了对酒、肉等的诱惑之中。
斯瓦米吉:正因如此,室利·罗摩克里希纳才降临于世。那种行持密宗的时代已经过去了。他也修炼了密宗,但不是以那种方式。在有关饮酒戒律的地方,他只是用一滴酒水触碰额头。密宗的礼拜形式是一片非常滑溜的地面。因此我说,这个省份对密宗已经经历得足够了。现在它必须向前超越。应当研习吠陀(Vedas)。四种瑜伽的和谐统一必须加以修习,并且必须严格保持纯洁梵行。
问:您所说的四种瑜伽的和谐统一是什么意思?
斯瓦米吉:对真实与虚幻之间的辨别、离欲(Vairagya)与虔信、工作与专注修习,以及在这一切之上,还须保持对妇女的恭敬态度。
问:一个人如何才能以恭敬之心看待女性呢?
斯瓦米吉:她们是神圣母亲(Divine Mother)的代表。印度真正的福祉将从神圣母亲崇拜真正开始的那一天起步,当每一个男性都在母亲的祭坛上献上自身的时候……
问:斯瓦米吉,在您年少时,我们劝您成婚,您回答说:"我不会的,但你们将见到我成为什么样的人。"您确实实现了您的话。
斯瓦米吉:是的,亲爱的兄长,你见到了我如何曾为食物所困,还要劳苦工作。哦,那是何等巨大的劳苦!如今,美国人出于爱护为我提供了这张舒适的床,我也有了食物可吃。但是,我也注定无福在肉身上享受——躺在这床垫上反而加重了我的病痛。我感到窒息,无从舒缓。我只得下来躺在地板上才能得到些许宽慰!
English
Swamiji: A very funny thing happened today. I
went to a friend's house. He has had a picture painted, the subject of which is "Shri Krishna addressing Arjuna on the battlefield of Kurukshetra". Shri Krishna stands on the chariot, holding the reins in His hand and preaching the Gita to Arjuna. He showed me the picture and asked me how I liked it. "Fairly well", I said. But as he insisted on having my criticism on it, I had to give my honest opinion by saying, "There is nothing in it to commend itself to me; first, because the chariot of the time of Shri Krishna was not like the modern pagoda - shaped car, and also, there is no expression in the figure of Shri Krishna."
Q.-- Was not the pagoda - chariot in use then?
Swamiji: Don't you know that since the Buddhistic era, there has been a great confusion in everything in our country? The kings never used to fight in pagoda - chariots. There are chariots even today in Rajputana that greatly resemble the chariots of old. Have you seen the chariots in the pictures of Grecian mythology? They have two wheels, and one mounts them from behind; we had that sort of chariot. What good is it to paint a picture if the details are wrong? An historical picture comes up to a standard of excellence when after making proper study and research, things are portrayed exactly as they were at that period. The truth must be represented, otherwise the picture is nothing. In these days, our young men who go in for painting are generally those who were unsuccessful at school, and who have been given up at home as good - for - nothing; what work of art can you expect from them? To paint a really good picture requires as much talent as to produce a perfect drama.
Q.-- how then should Shri Krishna be represented in the picture in question?
Swamiji: Shri Krishna ought to be painted as He really was, the Gita personified; and the central idea of the Gita should radiate from His whole form as He was teaching the path of Dharma to Arjuna, who had been overcome by infatuation and cowardice.
So saying Swamiji posed himself in the way in which Shri Krishna should be portrayed, and continued: "Look here, thus does he hold the bridle of the horses -- so tight that they are brought to their haunches, with their forelegs fighting the air, and their mouths gaping. This will show a tremendous play of action in the figure of Shri Krishna. His friend, the world - renowned hero, casting aside his bow and arrows, has sunk down like a coward on the chariot, in the midst of the two armies. And Shri Krishna, whip in one hand and tightening the reins with the other, has turned Himself towards Arjuna, with his childlike face beaming with unworldly love and sympathy, and a calm and serene look -- and is delivering the message of the Gita to his beloved comrade. Now, tell me what idea this picture of the Preacher of the Gita conveys to you."
The friend: Activity combined with firmness and serenity.
Swamiji: Ay, that's it! Intense action in the whole body, and withal a face expressing the profound calmness and serenity of the blue sky. This is the central idea of the Gita -- to be calm and steadfast in all circumstances, with one's body, mind, and soul centred at His hallowed Feet! [(Sanskrit)] (Gita IV.18)
He who even while doing action can keep his mind calm, and in whom, even when not doing any outward action, flows the current of activity in the form of the contemplation of Brahman, is the intelligent one among men, he indeed is the Yogi, he indeed is the perfect worker.
At this moment, the man who had been sent to arrange a boat returned and said that it was ready; so Swamiji told his friend, "Now let us go to the Math.
You must have left word at home that you were going there with me?"
They continued their talk as they walked to the boat.
Swamiji: This idea must be preached to everyone -- work, work, endless work -- without looking at results, and always keeping the whole mind and soul steadfast at the lotus feet of the Lord!
Q.-- but is this not Karma - yoga?
Swamiji: Yes, this is Karma - yoga; but without spiritual practices you will never be able to do this Karma - yoga. You must harmonise the four different Yogas; otherwise how can you always keep your mind and heart wholly on the Lord?
Q.-- it is generally said that work according to the Gita means the performance of Vedic sacrifices and religious exercises; any other kind of work is futile.
Swamiji: All right; but you must make it more comprehensive. Who is responsible for every action you do, every breath you take, and every thought you think? Isn't it you yourself?
The friend: Yes and no. I cannot solve this clearly. The truth about it is that man is the instrument and the Lord is the agent. So when I am directed by His will, I am not at all responsible for my actions.
Swamiji: Well, that can be said only in the highest state of realisation. When the mind will be purified by work and you will see that it is He who is causing all to work, then only you will have a right to speak like that. Otherwise it is all bosh, a mere cant.
Q.-- why so, if one is truly convinced by reasoning that the Lord alone is causing all actions to be done?
Swamiji: It may hold good when one has been so convinced. But it only lasts for that moment, and not a whit afterwards. Well, consider this thoroughly, whether all that you do in your everyday life, you are not doing with an egoistic idea that you yourself are the agent.
How long do you remember that it is the Lord who is making you work? But then, by repeatedly analysing like that, you will come to a state when the ego will vanish and in its place the Lord will come in. Then you will be able to say with justice "Thou, Lord, art guarding all my actions from within." But, my friend, if the ego occupies all the space within your heart, where forsooth will there be room enough for the Lord to come in? The Lord is verily absent!
Q.-- But it is He who is giving me the wicked impulse?
Swamiji: No, by no means. It would be blaspheming the Lord to think in that way. He is not inciting you to evil action, it is all the creation of your desire for self - gratification. If one says the Lord is causing everything to be done, and wilfully persists in wrong - doing, it only brings ruin on him. That is the origin of self - deception. Don't you feel an elation after you have done a good deed? You then give yourself the credit of doing something good -- you can't help it, it is very human. But how absurd to take the credit of doing the good act on oneself and lay the blame for the evil act on the Lord! It is a most dangerous idea -- the effect of ill - digested Gita and Vedanta. Never hold that view. Rather say that He is causing the good work to be done while you are responsible for the evil action. That will bring on devotion and faith, and you will see His grace manifested at every step. The truth about it is that no one has created you -- you have created yourself. This is discrimination, this is Vedanta. But one does not understand it before realisation. Therefore the aspirant should begin with the dualistic standpoint, that the Lord is causing the good actions, while he is doing the evil. This is the easiest way to the purification of the mind. Hence you find dualism so strong among the Vaishnavas. It is very difficult to entertain Advaitic (non - dualistic) ideas at the outset. But the dualistic standpoint gradually leads to the realisation of the Advaita.
Hypocrisy is always a dangerous thing. If there is no wilful self - deception, that is to say, if one sincerely believes that the most wicked impulse is also prompted by the Lord, rest assured that one will not have to do those mean acts for long. All the impurities of the mind are quickly destroyed. Our ancient scriptural writers understood this well. And I think that the Tantrika form of worship originated from the time that Buddhism began to decline and, through the oppression of the Buddhists, people began to perform their Vedic sacrifices in secret. They had no more opportunity to conduct them for two months at a stretch, so they made clay images, worshipped them, and consigned them to the water -- finishing everything in one night, without leaving the least trace! Man longs for a concrete symbol, otherwise his heart is not satisfied. So in every home that one - night sacrifice began to take place. As Shri Ramakrishna used to say, "Some enter the house by the scavenger's entrance", so the spiritual teachers of that time saw that those who could not perform any religious rite owing to their evil propensities, also needed some way of coming round by degrees to the path of virtue. For them those queer Tantrika rites came to be invented.
Q.-- They went on doing evil actions thinking them to be good. So how could this remove their evil tendencies?
Swamiji: Why, they gave a different direction to their propensities; they did them, but with the object of realising the Lord.
Q.-- Can this really be done?
Swamiji: It comes to the same thing. The motive must be right. And what should prevent them from succeeding?
Q.-- But many are caught in the temptation for wine, meat, etc. in trying to get along with such means.
Swamiji: It was therefore that Shri Ramakrishna came. The days of practising the Tantra in that fashion are gone. He, too, practised the Tantra, but not in that way. Where there is the injunction of drinking wine, he would simply touch his forehead with a drop of it. The Tantrika form of worship is a very slippery ground. Hence I say that this province has had enough of the Tantra. Now it must go beyond. The Vedas should be studied. A harmony of the four kinds of Yogas must be practised and absolute chastity must be preserved.
Q.-- What do you mean by the harmony of the four Yogas?
Swamiji: Discrimination between the real and the unreal, dispassion and devotion, work and practices in concentration, and along with these there must be a reverential attitude towards women.
Q.-- How can one look with reverence on women?
Swamiji: Well, they are the representatives of the Divine Mother. And real well - being of India will commence from the day that the worship of the Divine Mother will truly begin, and every man will sacrifice himself at the altar of the Mother. . . .
Q.-- Swamiji, in your boyhood, when we asked you to marry, you would reply, "I won't, but you will see what I shall become." You have actually verified your words.
Swamiji: Yes, dear brother, you saw how I was in want of food, and had to work hard besides. Oh, the tremendous labour! Today the Americans out of love have given me this nice bed, and I have something to eat also. But, also, I have not been destined to enjoy physically -- and lying on the mattress only aggravates my illness. I feel suffocated, as it were. I have to come down and lie on the floor for relief!
## References
文本来自Wikisource公共领域。原版由阿德瓦伊塔修道院出版。