辨喜文献馆

比较神学

卷7 lecture
1,042 字数 · 4 分钟阅读 · Notes of Class Talks and Lectures

本译文由人工智能辅助工具生成,可能存在不准确之处。如需查阅权威文本,请参考英文原文。

AI-translated. May contain errors. For accurate text, refer to the original English.

中文

昨夜,斯瓦米·辨喜在青年希伯来协会大厅就「比较神学」发表了一场演讲。这是此系列讲演中最为出色的一场,无疑进一步加深了这座城市民众对这位博学东方智者的普遍仰慕。

此前,辨喜的历次讲演皆为某一慈善事业而举行,可以确切地说,他为那些事业提供了实质性的援助。然而昨晚,他是为自己的利益而讲演。此次讲演由辨喜最热忱的友人与最虔诚的仰慕者之一胡·L·布林克利先生策划并主持。约有两百名听众昨晚聚集于大厅,最后一次聆听这位卓越的东方人在本城的演讲。

演讲者就讲题所阐明的第一个问题是:「各宗教之间,真的存在其教义所暗示的那种分歧吗?」

他断言,如今这种差异已不复存在,并回溯了所有宗教所走过的进步历程,将其引回到当下。他指出,在原始人类对上帝观念的认知上,这种意见分歧必然曾经存在,但随着世界在道德与智识上逐步前进,这些分歧变得越来越模糊,直至最终彻底消弭,而今已有一个普遍通行的教义——那就是绝对存在之说。

「没有任何一个野蛮人,」演讲者说,「不信奉某种形式的神。」

「现代科学并不表明它是否将此视为一种启示。爱在野蛮民族中并不强烈。他们生活在恐惧之中。在他们迷信的想象中,描绘着某种凶恶的精灵,面对这一念头,他们战栗不已。凡是他自己喜欢的,他便认为会取悦于那恶灵;凡是能安抚他的,他便认为能平息精灵之怒。为此,他甚至不惜与同族野蛮人为敌。」

演讲者继而以历史事实说明,野蛮人从祖先崇拜走向对大象的崇拜,而后走向诸神的崇拜,例如雷神与风暴之神。其后,世界的宗教进入多神教时代。「日出的壮美,日落的雄奇,繁星点缀的苍穹所呈现的神秘景象,以及雷鸣闪电的诡谲莫测,以一种无法解释的力量震撼了原始人,令他联想到一种更高更强大的存在,主宰着他目力所及的无限世界,」辨喜如此说道。

其后来临了另一个时代——一神教的时代。众神消散,融合为一,成为万神之神、宇宙的主宰。演讲者随后追溯雅利安民族直至那一时期,他们宣称:「我们在上帝中生活,在上帝中运动。祂即是运动本身。」而后又来临了另一个时代,形而上学上称之为「泛神论时代」。这一民族摈弃了多神论与一神论,以及上帝即宇宙的观念,说道:「我的灵魂之魂乃唯一真实的存在。我的本性即我的存在,并将向我自身扩展。」

辨喜随后论及佛教。他说,佛教徒既不断言也不否认上帝的存在。佛陀在被求问指引时,只会说:「你们看到苦难。那就努力减轻它。」对一位佛教徒而言,苦难无处不在,而社会则度量着他存在的范围。伊斯兰教徒,他说,信奉希伯来人的旧约与基督徒的新约。他们不喜欢基督徒,因为他们说基督徒是异端,传授人的崇拜。穆罕默德始终禁止追随者保有他本人的画像。

「接下来的问题是,」他说,「这些宗教是真实的,还是其中一些真实而另一些虚假?它们都达到了同一个结论,即绝对与无限的存在。统一是宗教的目标。随处可见的诸多现象,不过是统一体的无限多样。对宗教的分析表明,人并非从谬误走向真理,而是从较低层次的真理走向较高层次的真理。

「一个人拿着一件外衣来给众人穿。有些人说这件衣服不合身。好吧,你出去吧;你不能有外衣。问问某个基督教牧师,所有反对他教义与教条的其他宗派究竟有何问题,他会回答:'哦,他们不是基督徒。'但我们有比这更好的教诲。我们自身的本性、爱,以及科学——它们教给我们更好的。就像漩涡之于河流,去掉它们便会停滞。消灭意见上的分歧,思想便走向死亡。运动是必要的。思想是心智的运动,而当它停止,死亡便开始了。

「若将一个简单的空气分子置于一杯水的底部,它立刻便开始挣扎,急于归入其上方无限的大气。灵魂亦复如是。它在努力恢复其纯净的本性,从这物质之身中解脱出来。它渴望重获自身无限的扩展。这在任何地方都是一样的。无论是基督徒、佛教徒、伊斯兰教徒、不可知论者还是祭司,灵魂都在挣扎。一条河流沿蜿蜒的山坡流淌千里,抵达它汇入大海之处,却有人站在那里,告诉它回去重新开始,走一条更为直接的路!那个人是个愚人。你是一条从锡安山高处流下的河流。我从喜马拉雅山的崇峰流下。我不会对你说,回去,按我走过的路重新流下来,你错了。那比愚蠢更为错误。坚守你的信仰。真理永不消逝。书籍或许毁灭,民族或许在轰然崩塌中覆灭,但真理得以保存,并被某个人接起,重新传回社会,由此证明了上帝那宏大而绵延不绝的启示。」

English

"Comparative Theology" was the subject of a discourse last night by Swami Vive Kananda at the Young Men's Hebrew Association Hall. It was the blue - ribbon lecture of the series, and no doubt increased the general admiration the people of this city entertain for the learned gentleman.

Heretofore Vive Kananda has lectured for the benefit of one charity - worthy object or another, and it can be safely said that he has rendered them material aid. Last night, however, he lectured for his own benefit. The lecture was planned and sustained by Mr. Hu L. Brinkley, one of Vive Kananda's warmest friends and most ardent admirers. In the neighbourhood of two hundred gathered at the hall last night to hear the eminent Easterner for the last time in this city.

The first question the speaker asserted in connection with the subject was: "Can there be such a distinction between religions as their creeds would imply?"

He asserted that no differences existed now, and he retraced the line of progress made by all religions and brought it back to the present day. He showed that such variance of opinion must of necessity have existed with primitive man in regard to the idea of God, but that as the world advanced step by step in a moral and intellectual way, the distinctions became more and more indistinct, until finally it had faded away entirely, and now there was one all - prevalent doctrine -- that of an absolute existence. "No savage", said the speaker, "can be found who does not believe in some kind of a god." "Modern science does not say whether it looks upon this as a revelation or not. Love among savage nations is not very strong. They live in terror. To their superstitious imaginations is pictured some malignant spirit, before the thought of which they quake in fear and terror. Whatever he likes he thinks will please the evil spirit. What will pacify him he thinks will appease the wrath of the spirit. To this end he labours even against his fellow - savage."

The speaker went on to show by historical facts that the savage man went from ancestral worship to the worship of elephants, and later to gods, such as the God of Thunder and Storms. Then the religion of the world was polytheism. "The beauty of the sunrise, the grandeur of the sunset, the mystifying appearance of the star - bedecked skies, and the weirdness of thunder and lightning[nature] impressed primitive man with a force that he could not explain, and suggested the idea of a higher and more powerful being controlling the infinities that flocked before his gaze," said Vive Kananda.

Then came another period -- the period of monotheism. All the gods disappeared and blended into one, the God of Gods, the ruler of the universe. Then the speaker traced the Aryan race up to that period, where they said: "We live and move in God. He is motion." Then there came another period known to metaphysics as the "period of Pantheism". This race rejected Polytheism and Monotheism, and the idea that God was the universe, and said "the soul of my soul is the only true existence. My nature is my existence and will expand to me."

Vive Kananda then took up Buddhism. He said that they neither asserted nor denied the existence of a God. Buddha would simply say, when his counsel was sought: "You see misery. Then try to lessen it." To a Buddhist misery is ever present, and society measures the scope of his existence. Mohammedans, he said, believed in the Old Testament of the Hindu [Hebrew] and the New Testament of the Christian. They do not like the Christians, for they say they are heretics and teach man - worship. Mohammed ever forbade his followers having a picture of himself. "The next question that arises," said he, "are these religions true or are some of them true and some of them false? They have all reached one conclusion, that of an absolute and infinite existence. Unity is the object of religion. The multiple of phenomena that is seen at every hand is only the infinite variety of unity. an analysis of religion shows that man does not travel from fallacy to truth, but from a lower truth to a higher truth. "A man brings in a coat to a lot of people. Some say the coat does not fit them. Well, you get out; you can't have a coat. Ask one Christian minister what is the matter with all the other sects that are opposed to his doctrines and dogmas, and he will answer: 'Oh, they're not Christians.' But we have better instruction than these. Our own natures, love, and science -- they teach us better. Like the eddies to a river, take them away and stagnation follows. Kill the difference in opinions, and it is the death of thought. Motion is necessity. Thought is the motion of the mind, and when that ceases death begins. "If you put a simple molecule of air in the bottom of a glass of water it at once begins a struggle to join the infinite atmosphere above. So it is with the soul. It is struggling to regain its pure nature and to free itself from this material body. It wants to regain its own infinite expansion. This is everywhere the same. Among Christians, Buddhists, Mohammedans, agnostic, or priest, the soul is struggling. A river flows a thousand miles down the circuitous mountain side to where it joins the seas, and a man is standing there to tell it to go back and start anew and assume a more direct course! That man is a fool. You are a river that flows from the heights of Zion. I flow from the lofty peaks of the Himalayas. I don't say to you, go back and come down as I did, you're wrong. That is more wrong than foolish. Stick to your beliefs. The truth is never lost. Books may perish, nations may go down in a crash, but the truth is preserved and is taken up by some man and handed back to society, which proves a grand and continuous revelation of God."


文本来自Wikisource公共领域。原版由阿德瓦伊塔修道院出版。