辨喜文献馆

初步修习

卷4 lecture
3,531 字数 · 14 分钟阅读 · Addresses on Bhakti-Yoga

本译文由人工智能辅助工具生成,可能存在不准确之处。如需查阅权威文本,请参考英文原文。

AI-translated. May contain errors. For accurate text, refer to the original English.

中文

最初的步骤

论述虔信(Bhakti)的哲学家们将其定义为对神的极度之爱。人为何应当爱神,这是需要解决的问题;若不明白这一点,我们根本无法理解这一主题。人生有两种截然不同的理想。任何国家中,凡有宗教信仰的人,都知道自己既是一个身体,也是一个灵体。然而,关于人生目标,各方却存在极大的分歧。

在西方国家,人们通常更强调人的身体层面;而那些在印度论述虔信的哲学家,则着重于人的灵性层面。这种差异似乎是东方与西方民族的典型特征。即便在日常语言中也可见出这一点。在英国,谈到死亡时,说的是一个人"舍了他的灵魂";在印度,则说一个人"舍了他的身体"。一种观念认为,人是一个拥有灵魂的身体;另一种观念则认为,人是一个拥有身体的灵魂。由此引申出更为复杂的问题。认为人是身体而拥有灵魂的理想,自然将一切重心放在身体上。若你问人为何而活,你会被告知是为了享受感官、享受占有和财富。即便有人告诉他超越感官之物,他也无法想象;他对来世的概念,不过是此种享受的延续。他对不能在此处永远延续感到遗憾,但又不得不离去;他认为,以某种方式,他会去到某个地方,在那里同样的事物将会重新开始。他将拥有同样的享乐,同样的感官,只是更加增强和提升。他之所以想要崇拜神,是因为神是达成这一目的的手段。他的人生目标是感官对象的享乐,他得知有一位存在可以给予他这些享乐的长久保证,因此他前去崇拜神。

另一方面,印度的观念是:神是人生的目标;神之外别无所有,而感官享乐不过是我们目前经历的过程,期望借此获得更好的事物。不仅如此;倘若人除了感官享乐之外什么都没有,那将是灾难性的,是可怕的。在我们的日常生活中,我们发现感官享乐越少,一个人的生命层次越高。看看狗进食时的样子。没有任何人能以同样的满足感进食。看看猪在进食时满足地哼哼叫;那是它的天堂,即便最伟大的天使来到身旁,猪也不会注意到。它的整个存在都在进食之中。没有任何人能以那种方式进食。想想低等动物听觉的能力,视觉的能力;它们所有的感官都高度发达。它们的感官享乐是极度的;它们简直为喜悦和快乐而近乎疯狂。而人越是低下,他在感官中所发现的喜悦也越多。当他上升到更高的层次,目标便成为理性与爱。随着这些官能的发展,他失去了享受感官的能力。

为了说明起见,假设给予人一定数量的力量,这种力量可以用于身体、心灵或灵性,那么花费在其中任何一方的力量,便使可用于其他方面的力量相应减少。蒙昧或野蛮的种族,其感官能力远比文明种族强烈。事实上,这也是我们从历史中学到的教训之一:一个民族越是文明,神经组织便越精细,体质也越虚弱。文明化一个野蛮种族,你会发现同样的情况;另一个野蛮种族会兴起并征服它。几乎总是野蛮种族去征服的。由此可见,若我们只追求感官享乐,便会将自己降格为兽性的状态。一个人若说他想要去一个感官享乐可以强化的地方,他根本不知道自己在要求什么;那只有通过降格为禽兽才能得到。

因此,那些渴望充满感官享乐的天堂的人,就像猪在感官的泥泞中打滚,无法看见任何更高的东西。感官享乐是他们所渴望的,失去它便是失去天堂。这些人永远无法成为最高意义上的虔信者;他们永远无法成为神真正的爱慕者。尽管如此,即便这种较低的理想被遵循一段时间,随着时间的推移,它也会改变;每个人终将发现,有某种更高的东西是他所不知道的,因此这种对生命和感官事物的执着将逐渐消失。我在学校还是小孩时,曾为了一些糖果和另一个同学打架,那个同学比我强壮,从我手中把糖果抢走了。我记得那时的感受;我认为那个男孩是世上最邪恶的男孩,并且只要我足够强壮,我就会惩罚他;没有任何惩罚足以偿还他的罪恶。我们两人现在都已长大,如今是亲密的朋友。这个世界充满了婴儿,对他们来说饮食和那些小蛋糕就是一切。他们会梦见这些蛋糕,而他们对来世的想象是一个这些蛋糕极为充裕的地方。想想那个美洲印第安人,他相信自己的来世将是在一片极好的狩猎场。我们每个人都有一个关于天堂的理念,恰如我们所希望的那样;但随着岁月的增长,我们看到了更高的事物,便隐约瞥见了更远处更高的东西。但不要用现代的惯常方式来消解我们对来世的理念——不相信任何东西——那是毁灭。那种摧毁一切的不可知论者是错误的;虔信者(Bhakta)看到的是更高处。不可知论者不想去天堂,因为他根本没有天堂;而虔信者不想去天堂,因为他认为那不过是小孩子的游戏。他所想要的是神。

还有什么能比神更高的目标呢?神本身就是人类的最高目标;见神,享受神。我们无法构想任何更高的东西,因为神是圆满。我们无法构想任何比爱更高的享乐,但"爱"这个词有不同的含义。它不是指世间那种普通的自私之爱;将那称为爱,是一种亵渎。我们对子女和妻子的爱,不过是动物性的爱;唯有那完全无私的爱,才是唯一真正的爱,而那是对神的爱。这是一件极难达到的事。我们正在经历所有这些不同的爱——对子女的爱、对父亲、母亲等的爱。我们缓慢地训练爱的官能;但在大多数情况下,我们从中什么也学不到,我们被束缚于一个阶段、一个人上。有些人能够冲破这种束缚。人们在这个世界上永远追逐妻子、财富和名声;有时他们被重重地击打在头上,便发现了这个世界的真实面目。这个世界上,没有人真正能够爱除神以外的任何东西。人会发现,人类的爱完全是空洞的。人们无法真正去爱,尽管他们侃侃而谈。妻子说她爱丈夫并亲吻他;但丈夫一去世,她第一个想到的就是银行账户,以及明天该怎么办。丈夫爱妻子;但当她生病失去美貌,或变得憔悴,或犯了错误,他便停止了对她的关心。这世界上所有的爱都是虚伪和空洞的。

一个有限的主体不能去爱,一个有限的对象也不能被真正地爱。当一个人爱的对象每时每刻都在走向死亡,而他自己的心灵也随着成长而不断变化,你怎能期望在这世界上找到永恒的爱?在神之外,不可能有真正的爱:那么这世间所有的爱又是为了什么?不过是些阶段而已。背后有一种力量在推动我们前行,我们不知道在哪里寻找真正的对象,但这爱在推动我们向前寻觅。我们一次又一次地发现自己的错误。我们抓住某物,发现它从指间滑落,然后又抓住另一物。就这样一路走下去,直到最后光明来临;我们到达神那里——那唯一真正去爱的存在。祂的爱不知变化,随时准备将我们接纳。你们当中,若我伤害了你们,你们还能忍受我多久?心中没有愤怒、仇恨或嫉妒,从不失去平衡,不死也不生——除了神之外,祂还能是谁?然而通向神的道路是漫长而艰难的,很少有人能达到祂。我们都是在挣扎的婴儿。数百万人将宗教作为一种买卖。在一个世纪中,只有少数人能达到对神的那种爱,而整个国家便因此而得到祝福和圣化。当一位神的儿子出现,整个国家便受到祝福。诚然,在全世界的任何一个世纪中,此类人物都是稀少的,但所有人都应当努力追求那种对神的爱。谁知道,也许你或我将是下一个达到它的人?那就让我们奋力追求吧。

我们说一位妻子爱她的丈夫。她以为自己整个灵魂都沉浸在他身上:孩子来了,有一半流向了孩子,甚或更多。她自己也会感到,对丈夫的那份爱已不复从前。父亲亦是如此。我们常常发现,当更加强烈的爱的对象来到我们身边时,先前的爱便慢慢消逝。学校里的孩子们认为,他们的某些同学是生命中最珍贵的人,或者父亲母亲是最珍贵的;然后丈夫或妻子来了,旧的感情立刻消失,新的爱占据了主导地位。一颗星升起,另一颗更大的星出现,然后是更大的一颗,最终太阳出来了,所有较小的光芒都消失了。那太阳就是神。那些星辰便是较小的爱。当那轮太阳照耀在他身上,一个人便会变得如痴如醉——爱默生所谓的"被神陶醉的人"。人被转化成神,一切都融入那爱的无边大洋之中。普通的爱不过是动物性的吸引。否则,为什么会有性别之分?跪在偶像面前,是可怕的偶像崇拜;但跪在丈夫或妻子面前,却完全被允许!

这个世界向我们呈现出爱的种种阶段。我们首先必须清理地基。整套关于爱的理论将建立在我们对人生的看法之上。认为这个世界是人生的目的和终点,是野蛮的,是使人堕落的。任何以这种观念出发走进人生的人,都在使自己堕落。他永远不会上升到更高处,永远不会从背后瞥见那一眼,他将永远是感官的奴隶。他会为一美元而挣扎,用那美元换几块蛋糕来吃。与其如此生活,不如去死。这个世界的奴隶们,感官的奴隶们,让我们振作起来;有某种东西高于这种感官生活。你以为那无限之灵的人,是生来要做自己眼睛、鼻子和耳朵的奴隶的吗?在那之后有一个无限的、无所不知的灵,能做一切事,能打破每一道枷锁;那灵便是我们,而我们通过爱获得那种力量。这是我们必须铭记的理想。我们当然无法在一天之内就做到。我们可能自以为已经做到了,但终究只是一种幻想;那条路还极其漫长。我们必须在人们所处的地方接纳他,帮助他向上。人处于物质主义之中;你和我都是唯物主义者。我们谈论神和灵,是好的;但那不过是我们社会风气中所流行的谈资:我们像鹦鹉一样学来了,便重复着。所以我们必须接受我们作为唯物主义者的现状,借助物质的帮助,缓缓前行,直到我们成为真正的灵性修行者,感受到自己是灵体,理解灵性,并发现这个我们称之为无限的世界,不过是那个存在于背后的世界的一种粗糙的外在形式。

但除此之外,还有另一件事是必要的。你在《登山宝训》中读到:"你们祈求,就给你们;寻找,就寻见;叩门,就给你们开门。"难处在于:谁在寻找,谁在渴望?我们都说我们认识神。有人写书来驳斥神的存在,另一人写书来证明神的存在。有人认为证明神是他终身的职责;另一人则致力于驳斥神,四处宣扬说没有神。写书来证明或驳斥神,有什么用处?神是否存在,对大多数人来说有何关系?大多数人如同机器一般劳作,对神毫无思念,也感受不到对祂的需要。然后有一天,死亡来临,说:"来吧。"那人说:"等一等,我还想多一点时间。我想看着我的儿子再长大一点。"但死亡说:"立刻就来。"就这样持续下去。可怜的约翰就是这样过去了。我们能对可怜的约翰说什么呢?他从未发现神是最高的;也许他前世是一头猪,而他作为人已经好多了。但有些人得到了一点觉醒。某种苦难降临,我们最爱的人离去,我们倾注了整个灵魂、为了它而欺骗了整个世界乃至自己兄弟的那个东西消失了,一记重击落在我们身上。也许我们的灵魂中会响起一个声音,问道:"此后如何?"有时死亡在没有重击的情况下来临,但那样的情况是少数。我们大多数人,当有什么东西从指间溜走时,都会说:"下一步又是什么?"我们是何等地紧抓感官不放!你听说过溺水的人抓住一根稻草;一个人会先抓住稻草,当稻草也失去时,他才会说需要有人来帮助他。尽管如此,人们仍然必须,用英国人的话来说,"播种他们的野燕麦",然后才能上升到更高的事物。

虔信是一种宗教。宗教不是为众多人而设的,那是不可能的。那种站起又坐下的跪拜操练,或许适合众多人;但宗教是为少数人而设的。在每个国家,只有少数几百人能够并且愿意信奉宗教。其他人无法信奉宗教,因为他们不会觉醒,也不想觉醒。最关键的是渴望神。除了神,我们什么都想要,因为我们普通的需求由外部世界来满足;只有当我们的需求已经超越外部世界,我们才会向内部、向神寻求供给。只要我们的需求还局限在这个物质宇宙的狭隘范围之内,我们便无需神;只有当我们对此世的一切都感到厌倦饱足时,我们才会向更远处寻求供给。只有当需求存在时,渴望才会降临。尽快地结束这个世界的儿戏吧,然后你将感受到对世界之外某种东西的需要,而宗教的第一步便会到来。

有一种流行时尚式的宗教。我的朋友客厅里摆满了家具;流行摆一个日本花瓶,所以她必须有一个,即便要花一千美元。同样地,她也要有一点宗教,加入一个教堂。虔信不是为这样的人而设的。那不是渴望。渴望是那没有便无法存活的东西。我们需要呼吸,我们需要食物,我们需要衣物;没有这些,我们无法生存。当一个男人在这世上爱上一个女人,有时他感到没有她便无法生活,尽管那是一种误解。丈夫去世了,妻子以为自己无法没有他而活,但她终究还是活了下来。这便是需求的秘密:需求是那没有便无法生存的东西;要么它来到我们身边,要么我们死去。当那一天来临,我们对神也有同样的感受——换言之,我们渴望这个世界之外的某种东西,渴望凌驾于一切物质力量之上的某种东西——那时,我们或许能成为虔信者。当云层片刻散去,我们从远处瞥见一眼,就在那一刻,所有这些较低的欲望仿佛大海中的一滴,我们的小小生命又算什么?那时,灵魂成长了,感受到对神的渴望,必须拥有祂。

第一步是:我们想要什么?让我们每天问自己这个问题——我们渴望神吗?你可以读遍宇宙中所有的书籍,但这种爱无法凭借言辞的力量获得,无法凭借最高的智力获得,也无法凭借研究各种科学获得。渴望神的人将获得爱;神将祂自己给予他。爱总是相互的,具有反射性。你可能憎恨我,而若我想爱你,你会拒绝我。但若我坚持,一个月或一年后,你必然会爱上我。这是一种众所周知的心理现象。正如深情的妻子思念已逝的丈夫,我们必须以同样的爱渴望主,那时我们便会找到神,而所有的书籍和各种科学都无法教给我们任何东西。通过读书,我们成了鹦鹉;没有人通过读书而真正博学。若一个人只读了一个字的爱,他便真正博学了。因此,我们首先要得到那份渴望。

让我们每天问自己:"我们渴望神吗?"当我们开始谈论宗教,尤其是当我们占据高位并开始教导他人时,我们必须问自己同样的问题。我发现很多时候我并不渴望神,我更渴望面包。若我得不到一块面包,我可能会发疯;许多女士若得不到一枚钻石别针也会发疯,但她们对神没有同样的渴望;她们不知道宇宙中唯一的真实是什么。我们的语言中有一句谚语——若我想做猎人,我就去猎犀牛;若我想做强盗,我就去劫国王的金库。抢劫乞丐或猎捕蚂蚁有什么用?因此,若你想要去爱,就去爱神。谁在乎世界上的那些东西?这个世界是彻底虚假的;世上所有伟大的导师都发现了这一点;除了通过神,别无出路。祂是我们人生的目标;所有认为世界是人生目标的观念都是有害的。这个世界和这个身体有其自身的价值,是次要的价值,作为达到目的的手段;但世界不应成为目的。不幸的是,我们往往将世界作为目的,将神作为手段。我们见到人们去教堂祈祷说:"神啊,赐给我这个那个;神啊,治愈我的疾病。"他们想要健康的身体;因为听说有人能为他们做这件事,他们便去向祂祈祷。有这种宗教观念,不如做一个无神论者。正如我所告诉你们的,这种虔信是最高的理想;我不知道我们是否能在未来数百万年内达到它,但我们必须将它定为我们最高的理想,使我们的感官以最高为目标。若我们无法到达终点,至少也能靠近它。我们必须缓缓地历经世界和感官,去到达神那里。

English

THE FIRST STEPS

The philosophers who wrote on Bhakti defined it as extreme love for God. Why a man should love God is the question to be solved; and until we understand that, we shall not be able to grasp the subject at all. There are two entirely different ideals of life. A man of any country who has any religion knows that he is a body and a spirit also. But there is a great deal of difference as to the goal of human life.

In Western countries, as a rule, people lay more stress on the body aspect of man; those philosophers who wrote on Bhakti in India laid stress on the spiritual side of man; and this difference seems to be typical of the Oriental and Occidental nations. It is so even in common language. In England, when speaking of death it is said, a man gave up his ghost; in India, a man gave up his body. The one idea is that man is a body and has a soul; the other that man is a soul and has a body. More intricate problems arise out of this. It naturally follows that the ideal which holds that man is a body and has a soul lays all the stress on the body. If you ask why man lives, you will be told it is to enjoy the senses, to enjoy possessions and wealth. He cannot dream of anything beyond even if he is told of it; his idea of a future life would be a continuation of this enjoyment. He is very sorry that it cannot continue all the time here, but he has to depart; and he thinks that somehow or other he will go to some place where the same thing will be renewed. He will have the same enjoyments, the same senses, only heightened and strengthened. He wants to worship God, because God is the means to attain this end. The goal of his life is enjoyment of sense-objects, and he comes to know there is a Being who can give him a very long lease of these enjoyments, and that is why he worships God.

On the other hand the Indian idea is that God is the goal of life; there is nothing beyond God, and the sense-enjoyments are simply something through which we are passing now in the hope of getting better things. Not only so; it would be disastrous and terrible if man had nothing but sense-enjoyments. In our everyday life we find that the less the sense-enjoyments, the higher the life of the man. Look at the dog when he eats. No man ever ate with the same satisfaction. Observe the pig giving grunts of satisfaction as he eats; it is his heaven, and if the greatest archangel came and looked on, the pig would not even notice him. His whole existence is in his eating. No man was ever born who could eat that way. Think of the power of hearing in the lower animals, the power of seeing; all their senses are highly developed. Their enjoyment of the senses is extreme; they become simply mad with delight and pleasure. And the lower the man also, the more delight he finds in the senses. As he gets higher, the goal becomes reason and love. In proportion as these faculties develop, he loses the power of enjoying the senses.

For illustration's sake, if we take for granted that a certain amount of power is given to man, and that that can be spent either on the body, or the mind, or the spirit, then all the powers spent on any one of these leaves just so much less to be expended on the others. The ignorant or savage races have much stronger sensual faculties than the civilised races, and this is, in fact, one of the lessons we learn from history that as a nation becomes civilised the nerve organisation becomes finer, and they become physically weaker. Civilise a savage race, and you will find the same thing; another barbarian race comes up and conquers it. It is nearly always the barbarian race that conquers. We see then that if we desire only to have sense-enjoyments all the time, we degrade ourselves to the brute state. A man does not know what he is asking for when he says, he wants to go to a place where his sense-enjoyments will be intensified; that he can only have by going down to the brutes.

So with men desiring a heaven full of sense-pleasures. They are like swine wallowing in the mire of the senses, unable to see anything beyond. This sense-enjoyment is what they want, and the loss of it is the loss of heaven to them. These can never be Bhaktas in the highest sense of the word; they can never be true lovers of God. At the same time, though this lower ideal be followed for a time, it will also in course of time change, each man will find that there is something higher, of which he did not know, and so this clinging to life and to things of the senses will gradually die away. When I was a little boy at school, I had a fight with another schoolfellow about some sweetmeats, and he being the stronger boy snatched them from my hand. I remember the feeling I had; I thought that boy was the most wicked boy ever born, and that as soon as I grew strong enough I would punish him; there was no punishment sufficient for his wickedness. We have both grown up now, and we are fast friends. This world is full of babies to whom eating and drinking, and all these little cakes are everything. They will dream of these cakes, and their idea of future life is where these cakes will be plentiful. Think of the American Indian who believes that his future life will be in a place which is a very good hunting ground. Each one of us has an idea of a heaven just as we want it to be; but in course of time, as we grow older and see higher things, we catch higher glimpses beyond. But let us not dispense with our ideas of future life in the ordinary way of modern times, by not believing in anything — that is destruction. The agnostic who thus destroys everything is mistaken, the Bhakta sees higher. The agnostic does not want to go to heaven, because he has none; while the Bhakta does not want to go to heaven, because he thinks it is child's play. What he wants is God.

What can be a higher end than God? God Himself is the highest goal of man; see Him, enjoy Him. We can never conceive anything higher, because God is perfection. We cannot conceive of any higher enjoyment than that of love, but this word love has different meanings. It does not mean the ordinary selfish love of the world; it is blasphemy to call that love. The love for our children and our wives is mere animal love; that love which is perfectly unselfish is the only love, and that is of God. It is a very difficult thing to attain to. We are passing through all these different loves — love of children, father, mother, and so forth. We slowly exercise the faculty of love; but in the majority of cases we never learn anything from it, we become bound to one step, to one person. In some cases men come out of this bondage. Men are ever running after wives and wealth and fame in this world; sometimes they are hit very hard on the head, and they find out what this world really is. No one in this world can really love anything but God. Man finds out that human love is all hollow. Men cannot love though they talk of it. The wife says she loves her husband and kisses him; but as soon as he dies, the first thing she thinks about is the bank account, and what she shall do the next day. The husband loves the wife; but when she becomes sick and loses her beauty, or becomes haggard, or makes a mistake, he ceases to care for her. All the love of the world is hypocrisy and hollowness.

A finite subject cannot love, nor a finite object be loved. When the object of the love of a man is dying every moment, and his mind also is constantly changing as he grows, what eternal love can you expect to find in the world? There cannot be any real love but in God: why then all these loves? These are mere stages. There is a power behind impelling us forward, we do not know where to seek for the real object, but this love is sending us forward in search of it. Again and again we find out our mistake. We grasp something, and find it slips through our fingers, and then we grasp something else. Thus on and on we go, till at last comes light; we come to God, the only One who loves. His love knows no change and is ever ready to take us in. How long would any of you bear with me if I injured you? He in whose mind is no anger, hatred, or envy, who never loses his balance, dies, or is born, who is he but God? But the path to God is long and difficult, and very few people attain Him. We are all babies struggling. Millions of people make a trade of religion. A few men in a century attain to that love of God, and the whole country becomes blessed and hallowed. When a son of God appears, a whole country becomes blessed. It is true that few such are born in any one century in the whole world, but all should strive to attain that love of God. Who knows but you or I may be the next to attain? Let us struggle therefore.

We say that a wife loves her husband. She thinks that her whole soul is absorbed in him: a baby comes and half of it goes out to the baby, or more. She herself will feel that the same love of husband does not exist now. So with the father. We always find that when more intense objects of love come to us, the previous love slowly vanishes. Children at school think that some of their schoolfellows are the dearest beings that they have in life, or their fathers or mothers are so; then comes the husband or wife, and immediately the old feeling disappears, and the new love becomes uppermost. One star arises, another bigger one comes, and then a still bigger one, and at last the sun comes, and all the lesser lights vanish. That sun is God. The stars are the smaller loves. When that Sun bursts upon him, a man becomes mad what Emerson calls "a God-intoxicated man". Man becomes transfigured into God, everything is merged in that one ocean of love. Ordinary love is mere animal attraction. Otherwise why is the distinction between the sexes? If one kneels before an image, it is dreadful idolatry; but if one kneels before husband or wife, it is quite permissible!

The world presents to us manifold stages of love. We have first to clear the ground. Upon our view of life the whole theory of love will rest. To think that this world is the aim and end of life is brutal and degenerating. Any man who starts in life with that idea degenerates himself He will never rise higher, he will never catch this glimpse from behind, he will always be a slave to the senses. He will struggle for the dollar that will get him a few cakes to eat. Better die than live that life. Slaves of this world, slaves of the senses, let us rouse ourselves; there is something higher than this sense-life. Do you think that man, the Infinite Spirit was born to be a slave to his eyes, his nose, and his ears? There is an Infinite, Omniscient Spirit behind that can do everything, break every bond; and that Spirit we are, and we get that power through love. This is the ideal we must remember. We cannot, of course, get it in a day. We may fancy that we have it, but it is a fancy after all; it is a long, long way off. We must take man where he stands, and help him upwards. Man stands in materialism; you and I are materialists. Our talking about God and Spirit is good; but it is simply the vogue in our society to talk thus: we have learnt it parrot-like and repeat it. So we have to take ourselves where we are as materialists, and must take the help of matter and go on slowly until we become real spiritualists, and feel ourselves spirits, understand the spirit, and find that this world which we call the infinite is but a gross external form of that world which is behind.

But something besides that is necessary. You read in the Sermon on the Mount, "Ask, and it shall be given (to) you; seek, and ye shall find; knock, and it shall be opened unto you." The difficulty is, who seeks, who wants? We all say we know God. One man writes a book to disprove God, another to prove Him. One man thinks it his duty to prove Him all his life; another, to disprove Him, and he goes about to teach man there is no God. What is the use of writing a book either to prove or disprove God? What does it matter to most people whether there is a God or not ? The majority of men work just like a machine with no thought of God and feeling no need of Him. Then one day comes Death and says, "Come." The man says, "Wait a little, I want a little more time. I want to see my son grow a little bigger." But Death says, "Come at once." So it goes on. So goes poor John. What shall we say to poor John? He never found anything in which God was the highest; perhaps he was a pig in the past, and he is much better as a man. But there are some who get a little awakening. Some misery comes, someone whom we love most dies, that upon which we had bent our whole soul, that for which we had cheated the whole world and perhaps our own brother, that vanishes, and a blow comes to us. Perhaps a voice comes in our soul and asks, "What after this?" Sometimes death comes without a blow, but such cases are few. Most of us, when anything slips through our fingers, say, "What next?" How we cling to the senses! You have heard of a drowning man clutching at a straw; a man will clutch at a straw first, and when it fails, he will say someone must help him. Still people must, as the English phrase goes, "sow their wild oats", before they can rise to higher things.

Bhakti is a religion. Religion is not for the many, that is impossible. A sort of knee-drill, standing up and sitting down, may be suited for the many; but religion is for the few. There are in every country only a few hundreds who can be, and will be religious. The others cannot be religious, because they will not be awakened, and they do not want to be. The chief thing is to want God. We want everything except God, because our ordinary wants are supplied by the external world; it is only when our necessities have gone beyond the external world that we want a supply from the internal, from God. So long as our needs are confined within the narrow limits of this physical universe, we cannot have any need for God; it is only when we have become satiated with everything here that we look beyond for a supply. It is only when the need is there that the demand will come. Have done with this child's play of the world as soon as you can, and then you will feel the necessity of something beyond the world, and the first step in religion will come.

There is a form of religion which is fashionable. My friend has much furniture in her parlour; it is the fashion to have a Japanese vase, so she must have one even if it costs a thousand dollars. In the same way she will have a little religion and join a church. Bhakti is not for such. That is not want. Want is that without which we cannot live. We want breath, we want food, we want clothes; without them we cannot live. When a man loves a woman in this world, there are times when he feels that without her he cannot live, although that is a mistake. When a husband dies, the wife thinks she cannot live without him; but she lives all the same. This is the secret of necessity: it is that without which we cannot live; either it must come to us or we die. When the time comes that we feel the same about God, or in other words, we want something beyond this world, something above all material forces, then we may become Bhaktas. What are our little lives when for a moment the cloud passes away, and we get one glimpse from beyond, and for that moment all these lower desires seem like a drop in the ocean? Then the soul grows, and feels the want of God, and must have Him.

The first step is: What do we want? Let us ask ourselves this question every day, do we want God? You may read all the books in the universe, but this love is not to be had by the power of speech, not by the highest intellect, not by the study of various sciences. He who desires God will get Love, unto him God gives Himself. Love is always mutual, reflective. You may hate me, and if I want to love you, you repulse me. But if I persist, in a month or a year you are bound to love me. It is a wellknown psychological phenomenon. As the loving wife thinks of her departed husband, with the same love we must desire the Lord, and then we will find God, and all books and the various sciences would not be able to teach us anything. By reading books we become parrots; no one becomes learned by reading books. If a man reads but one word of love, he indeed becomes learned. So we want first to get that desire.

Let us ask ourselves each day, "Do we want Gods" When we begin to talk religion, and especially when we take a high position and begin to teach others, we must ask ourselves the same question. I find many times that I don't want God, I want bread more. I may go mad if I don't get a piece of bread; many ladies will go mad if they don't get a diamond pin, but they do not have the same desire for God; they do not know the only Reality that is in the universe. There is a proverb in our language — If I want to be a hunter, I'll hunt the rhinoceros; if I want to be a robber, I'll rob the king's treasury. What is the use of robbing beggars or hunting ants? So if you want to love, love God. Who cares for these things of the world? This world is utterly false; all the great teachers of the world found that out; there is no way out of it but through God. He is the goal of our life; all ideas that the world is the goal of life are pernicious. This world and this body have their own value, a secondary value, as a means to an end; but the world should not be the end. Unfortunately, too often we make the world the end and God the means. We find people going to church and saying, "God, give me such and such; God, heal my disease." They want nice healthy bodies; and because they hear that someone will do this work for them, they go and pray to Him. It is better to be an atheist than to have such an idea of religion. As I have told you, this Bhakti is the highest ideal; I don't know whether we shall reach it or not in millions of years to come, but we must make it our highest ideal, make our senses aim at the highest. If we cannot get to the end, we shall at least come nearer to it. We have slowly to work through the world and the senses to reach God.


文本来自Wikisource公共领域。原版由阿德瓦伊塔修道院出版。