辨喜文献馆

印度教徒的若干习俗

卷2 essay
972 字数 · 4 分钟阅读 · Reports in American Newspapers

本译文由人工智能辅助工具生成,可能存在不准确之处。如需查阅权威文本,请参考英文原文。

AI-translated. May contain errors. For accurate text, refer to the original English.

中文

印度教徒的若干习俗

(《布鲁克林标准联合报》,一八九五年四月八日)

布鲁克林伦理协会昨晚在克林顿大道波奇画廊举行了一场特别会议,以印度教僧侣斯瓦米·辨喜的演讲为主轴。演讲题目为"印度教徒的若干习俗——其含义及被误解之处",宽敞的画廊里人头攒动。

身着东方服饰,双目炯炯,面色泛红,斯瓦米·辨喜开始讲述他的人民、他的国土及其习俗。他只希望人们给予他和他的同胞公正的对待。演讲伊始,他说要给听众一个关于印度的总体印象。他说印度不是一个国家,而是一块大陆;那些从未到过印度的旅行者散布了许多错误的观念。他说那里有九种独立的语言和一百多种不同的方言。他严厉批评了那些写作印度题材的人,称其思想被迷信所蒙蔽,以为凡是在其自身宗教圈子之外的人都是可怕的无赖。其中一个常遭误解的习俗是印度教徒刷牙的方式。他们从不将毛发或兽皮放入口中,而是使用一种植物。"于是有人写道,"演讲者说,"印度教徒早起后便将一棵植物吞下。"他说[寡妇投身于朱格纳特神车轮下的]那种习俗并不存在,从未存在过,无人知晓这个故事是从何而来的。

斯瓦米·辨喜关于种姓制度的谈话最为全面而引人入胜。他说种姓并非一个按等级划分的阶级体系,而是每个种姓都认为自己高于所有其他种姓。他说种姓是一种行会组织,而非宗教机构。他说种姓制度自远古便已存在,并解释了起初只有某些权利是世袭的,后来束缚逐渐收紧,通婚及饮食均被限制于各自种姓之内的演变过程。

演讲者讲述了一个基督徒或伊斯兰教徒的仅仅出现,会对印度教家庭产生怎样的影响。他说一个白人踏入印度教徒跟前,是确实意义上的污染,在接待了一个不同宗教的人之后,印度教徒必定要沐浴净身。

这位印度教僧侣对贱民阶层进行了严厉的批评,说他们从事一切卑贱工作,食腐肉,是清道夫。他还说写印度书籍的人,只与这些人打交道,而非与真正的印度教徒接触。他描述了对违反种姓规则者的惩处方式,说所施加的唯一惩罚,是该种姓拒绝与其本人及其子女通婚或共同饮食。其他一切说法皆属谬误。

在解释种姓制度的弊端时,演讲者说,种姓通过阻止竞争而导致了停滞,彻底阻碍了民众的进步。他说种姓在消除残酷竞争的同时,也阻碍了社会的改善。在遏制竞争的同时,它又促进了人口的增长。而其优点则在于:它是平等与博爱唯一真正的理想,财富与种姓中的社会地位毫无关系,人人平等。他说所有伟大改革者的错误,都在于他们认为种姓制度仅源于宗教的制约,而没有将其归因于正确的根源,即那些奇特的社会状况。他对英国人和伊斯兰教徒试图以刺刀、炮火与刀剑来"文明化"印度的做法,措辞激烈地表示了谴责。他说,要废除种姓制度,就必须彻底改变社会状况,摧毁整个国家的经济体系。他说,与其如此,不如让孟加拉湾的浪涛汹涌而至将一切淹没。英国文明由三个"B"构成——《圣经》(Bible)、刺刀(Bayonet)、白兰地(Brandy)。"这便是文明,而且已被推行至如此程度,以至于一个印度教徒的平均月收入只有五十美分。俄国在一旁说着:'让我们也来文明化一番吧',而英国则一往无前,永无止境。"

这位僧侣在台上来回踱步,越说越激动,语速加快,讲述着印度教徒所受到的种种对待。他痛斥那些接受西方教育的印度人,描述他们"满怀香槟与新思想"回到故土的情形。他说童婚之所以坏,是因为西方这么说;婆婆可以肆意折磨媳妇,而儿子却不能出面干涉。他说外国人无时无刻不找机会虐待异教徒,因为他们自身有那么多的弊病,巴不得将其遮掩。他说每个民族都必须寻求自己的救赎,没有任何人能为其解决问题。

在谈到印度的恩人时,他询问美国是否曾听说过大卫·黑尔[David Hare],此人创办了第一所女子学院,将自己的大半生献给了教育事业。

演讲者引用了若干对英国人并不恭维的印度谚语。在结语中,他诚恳地为自己的国土发出呼吁,说道:

"只要印度忠实于自身及其宗教,一切都无关紧要。然而,当这个可怕的无神西方将虚伪与无信仰传入她的腹地时,便已向她的心脏刺出了一剑。与其送去一篓篓的谩骂、一车车的诋毁、一船船的谴责,不如让一股无尽的爱流涌现出来。让我们都做一个真正的人。"

English

SOME CUSTOMS OF THE HINDUS

(Brooklyn Standard Union, April 8, 1895)

A special meeting of the Brooklyn Ethical Association with an address by Swami Vivekananda, the Hindu monk as the main feature, was held at the Pouch Gallery, of Clinton avenue, last night. "Some customs of the Hindus what they mean, and how they are misinterpreted," was the subject treated. A large throng of people filled the spacious gallery.

Dressed in his Oriental costume, his eyes bright, and a flush mantling his face, Swami Vivekananda started to tell of his people, of his country, and its customs. He desired only that justice be shown to him and to his. In the beginning of his discourse he said he would give a general idea of India. He said it was not a country but a continent; that erroneous ideas had been promulgated by travellers who had never seen the country. He said that there were nine separate languages spoken and over 100 different dialects. He spoke severely of those who wrote about his country, and said their brains were addled by superstition, and that they had an idea that everyone outside of the pale of their own religion was a horrible blackguard. One of the customs that had often been misinterpreted was the brushing of the teeth by the Hindus. They never put hair or skin in their mouths, but use a plant. "Hence a man wrote," said the speaker, "that the Hindus get up early in the morning and swallow a plant." He said the [custom of widows throwing themselves under the] car of juggernaut did not exist, never had, and that no one knew how such a story started.

Swami Vivekananda's talk on caste was most comprehensive and interesting. He said it was not a granted [graded] system of classes, but that each caste thought itself to be superior to all the others. He said it was a trade guild and not a religious institution. He said that it had been in existence from time immemorial, and explained how at first only certain rights were hereditary, but how afterward the ties were bound closer, and intermarriage and eating and drinking were restricted to each caste.

The speaker told of the effect that the mere presence of a Christian or Mohammedan would have on a Hindu household. He said that it was veritable pollution for a white man to step into a Hindu's presence, and that after receiving one outside of his religion, the Hindu always took a bath.

The Hindu monk abused [?] the order of the Pariahs roundly, saying they did all the menial work, ate carrion and were the scavengers. He also said that the people who wrote books on India came only into contact with these people, and not with genuine Hindus. He described the trial of one who broke the rules of caste, and said that the only punishment inflicted was the refusal of the particular caste to intermarry or drink or eat with him or his children. All other ideas were erroneous.

In explaining the defects of caste, the speaker said that in preventing competition it produced stagnation, and completely blocked the progress of the people. He said that in taking away brutality it stopped social improvements. In checking competition it increased population. In its favor, he said, were the facts that it was the only ideal of equality and fraternity. That money had nothing to do with social standing in the caste. All were equal. He said that the fault of all the great reformers was that they thought caste was due only to religious representation, instead of ascribing it to the right source, namely, the curious social conditions. He spoke very bitterly of the attempts of the English and Mohammedans to civilize the country by the bayonet and fire and sword. He said that to abolish caste one must change the social conditions completely ant destroy the entire economic system of the country. Better, he said, that the waves of the [Bay of] Bengal flow and drown all rather than this. English civilization was composed of the three "B's" — Bible, bayonet, and brandy. "That is civilization, and it has been carried to such an extent that the average income of a Hindu is 50 cents a month. Russia is outside, saying. 'Let's civilize a little,' and England goes on and on."

The monk grew excited as he walked up and down, talking rapidly about the way the Hindus had been treated. He scored the foreign educated Hindus, and described their return to their native land, "full of champagne and new ideas". He said that child-marriage was bad, because the West said so, and that the mother-in-law could torture her daughter-in-law with impunity, as the son could not interfere. He said that the foreigners took every opportunity to abuse the heathen, because they had so many evils of their own that they wanted to cover them up. He said that each nation must work out its own salvation, and that no one else could solve its problems.

In speaking of India's benefactors he asked whether America had ever heard of David Herr [Hare], who established the first college for women, and who had devoted so much of his life to education.

The speaker gave a number of Indian proverbs that were not at all complimentary to the English. In closing he made an earnest appeal for his land. He said:

"It matters not as long as India is true to herself and to her religion. But a blow has been struck at her heart by this awful godless West when she sends hypocrisy and atheism into her midst. Instead of sending bushels of abuses, carloads of vituperation and shiploads of condemnations, let an endless stream of love go forth. Let us all be men"


文本来自Wikisource公共领域。原版由阿德瓦伊塔修道院出版。